11-21-2023, 04:16 PM
|
#11
|
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,353 Times in 554 Posts
|
Re: Season averages
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Hoven
I wonder if anyone that had to play "the game" ever stopped to think that maybe they have to play "the game" because their combo is soft... The only thing lowering the indexes is going to do, is widen the gap between those with money, and those without. There are lots of cars, for example, those playing "the game" that, if the indexes were moved .3, can, for example, move their distributor, pull out some oil, un-pin the secondaries on their holley's, etc, and easily gain back .2 if not the full .3, and still be a 1.0 under player. Unfortunately, young racers like me, that can't afford to go to engine builder x,y or z and ask for a 1.2+ second under engine that somehow magically passes tech, would be forced to accept the fact that my .5-.6 under car, is now a .2-.3 under car, and if I somehow found those .3 back, I'm still only a .5 under car. But hey, at least the rich guys with the fast cars could then run their cars all out.
|
I agree with a lot of what you are saying. But, I feel that the argument that you have to be rich to go fast is weak.
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams
NHRA Stock/SS 2007
|
|
|