HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2017, 07:22 PM   #1
midnightbluS10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 13
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Beard View Post
OMG.... how do you think they do tech at bracket races? Go through tech: "How fast do you run?" "10.50's" "OK, you need XYZ." This is NOT hard.

And YES, the tech guys already watch E.T.'s. A friend has always wanted to run a 9.99 just once with his Stocker, but doesn't have a full cage. He was specifically told there would be no grace period. One 9.99 and he was out of the event.


Again, the idea that one car running 10.80's requires far more stringent safety standards than an identical car running 10.00 is ludicrous. It also creates a potentially massive problem with insurance. What happens when a 10-oh car wrecks with a roll bar, -1 suit, etc., and the insurance company says, "Why didn't this car and driver meet the same safety standards as this other car that's much slower, but requires a full cage, -5 suit, competition license, ad infinitum?"
Somebody want to clarify this for me? Are you talking about 2 of the exact same car having the differences listed or are you comparing a something like 2014 COPO Camaro to a 1970 Nova, for example?


If it's the latter, or anything similar, the reason should be obvious One is built with better safety standards, characteristics, and features built into the car and they're taking that into account, it would seem. Is it right? I have no idea. I'm no engineer or crash expert or anything else like that lol.

If you're comparing 2 of the same car then I don't have any ideas. Sorry.
midnightbluS10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 09:00 PM   #2
Michael Beard
VIP Member
 
Michael Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightbluS10 View Post
Somebody want to clarify this for me? Are you talking about 2 of the exact same car having the differences listed or are you comparing a something like 2014 COPO Camaro to a 1970 Nova, for example?


If it's the latter, or anything similar, the reason should be obvious One is built with better safety standards, characteristics, and features built into the car and they're taking that into account, it would seem. Is it right? I have no idea. I'm no engineer or crash expert or anything else like that lol.

If you're comparing 2 of the same car then I don't have any ideas. Sorry.
275hp carbureted 360 in my Volare in SS/GT can run 10.00 with a roll bar, -1 suit, etc.
275hp EFI 360 in my Volare, FGT requires full cage, -5 suit, etc... all of the 9.99-quicker requirements but at ANY E.T.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS
Michael Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 11:32 AM   #3
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Beard View Post
275hp carbureted 360 in my Volare in SS/GT can run 10.00 with a roll bar, -1 suit, etc.
275hp EFI 360 in my Volare, FGT requires full cage, -5 suit, etc... all of the 9.99-quicker requirements but at ANY E.T.
My favorite example:

A newbie with a 5.0 Mustang wants to try M/SA with NHRA..13 second car at altitude.
He needs a roll bar , 2 year belts , jacket, pants.
Or, he stays in brackets or test and tune nights, and needs none of the above, down to 11.50.
I talked to Bruce about this several years ago, and he sort of agreed with me.He said he'd bring it up.
Never heard any more about it.
Doesn't seem to matter to NHRA. They don't want the new kid anyway, unless he's willing to shell it out for 5-6 divisionals.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2017, 12:17 AM   #4
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
My favorite example:

A newbie with a 5.0 Mustang wants to try M/SA with NHRA..13 second car at altitude.
He needs a roll bar , 2 year belts , jacket, pants.
Or, he stays in brackets or test and tune nights, and needs none of the above, down to 11.50.
I talked to Bruce about this several years ago, and he sort of agreed with me.He said he'd bring it up.
Never heard any more about it.
Doesn't seem to matter to NHRA. They don't want the new kid anyway, unless he's willing to shell it out for 5-6 divisionals.

Yup.....made same point moving to NHRA.
Mike Beard made similar point earlier too.
Plus need a custom gas tank and special fuel.

Like I mentioned earlier ... NHRA needs us.
If NHRA relaxed to the 11.50 rule more of us would be right there!

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2017, 07:12 AM   #5
Bob Mulry
VIP Member
 
Bob Mulry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fahey View Post
Yup.....made same point moving to NHRA.
Mike Beard made similar point earlier too.
Plus need a custom gas tank and special fuel.

Like I mentioned earlier ... NHRA needs us.
If NHRA relaxed to the 11.50 rule more of us would be right there!

D

The last thing that NHRA needs is you......
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK
A & M Motorsports
Bob Mulry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2017, 09:19 AM   #6
MR DERBY CITY
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,641
Likes: 1,083
Liked 7,944 Times in 1,521 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Mulry View Post
The last thing that NHRA needs is you......
I nominate this for POST of the year.......
MR DERBY CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2017, 09:30 AM   #7
Hacksaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 884
Likes: 207
Liked 310 Times in 174 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

I disagree with Bob and MJ . Our sport needs people with passion and desire, also willing to support from the financial side, like Dan. The problem here is that he would rather focus his efforts on change instead of conform. He just needs to throw away his "King" of Pure Stock status and fit in, or back off.
Hacksaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2017, 02:28 PM   #8
James Perrone
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 3,388
Liked 1,829 Times in 427 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Mulry View Post
The last thing that NHRA needs is you......
Sooooo true. I can’t stop laughing. Delusional Dan.
BINGO
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK
James Perrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2017, 12:47 PM   #9
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 2,909
Liked 5,126 Times in 1,954 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fahey View Post
Yup.....made same point moving to NHRA.
Mike Beard made similar point earlier too.
Plus need a custom gas tank and special fuel.

Like I mentioned earlier ... NHRA needs us.
If NHRA relaxed to the 11.50 rule more of us would be right there!

D
Actually, Dan may have a point here this time.
If he wanted to hop is up a little to run low 12's in J/SA, why should he need a roll bar, etc.?
Are 11.50 bracket cars generally considered better prepared, maintained, and therefore safer than Stock Eliminator cars?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2017, 04:24 PM   #10
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: 2017 to 2018 Rule Amendments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Actually, Dan may have a point here this time.
If he wanted to hop is up a little to run low 12's in J/SA, why should he need a roll bar, etc.?
Are 11.50 bracket cars generally considered better prepared, maintained, and therefore safer than Stock Eliminator cars?
Correct Mark
Simple as a better cam, springs, more gear to compete !
Might even see an interest to move to the higher classes.

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.