|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,120 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If he wanted to hop is up a little to run low 12's in J/SA, why should he need a roll bar, etc.? Are 11.50 bracket cars generally considered better prepared, maintained, and therefore safer than Stock Eliminator cars?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Simple as a better cam, springs, more gear to compete ! Might even see an interest to move to the higher classes. D |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
why now fn bs suck a bfd
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 709
Likes: 2,671
Liked 238 Times in 111 Posts
|
![]()
Despite whatever reasoning was behind IHRA's decision, The Problem now is that there are a bunch of "I" class cars with nowhere to go. There are events like the Northern Class Nationals that run both "N" and "I" cars. I would think that such a major decision like what IHRA has made would draw the attention of NHRA somehow. Marketing for divisionals? I don't know the car counts that the CM, PS or S/GT classes had but the traditional "i" S/SS cars can blend right in. We've seen the problem, what are potential SOLUTIONS.
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|