Stock Suggestion # 1

Qwikpony · 09-10-2014, 01:23 AM

Once again, after 12 pages of the same stuff, re-read Chuck Rayburn's idea on the first page. That is the answer (mine too). A few letter changes and they can be "FX","FI" or any other designation NHRA wants as long as they are not racing "heads up" with the older cars. In the event that NHRA does nothing to reclassify these cars and the "heads up" beatings continue (which they will in the current format), you all should start thinking about other ways to stay competitive (i.e.- lower the horsepower ratings on the older carbureted cars if they are forced to remain in their current classes.) I can't wait to see these very same posts in 10 years (if this stuff still exists) when the DP, CJ and COPO guys are complaining about the (then to be) new cars having too much voltage and making 1100 hp (and hooking) because they have bigger batteries and a 512 bit torque management processor with a 960 hz refresh rate.

09-10-2014, 01:23 AM	#11
Qwikpony Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 15 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Stock Suggestion # 1 Once again, after 12 pages of the same stuff, re-read Chuck Rayburn's idea on the first page. That is the answer (mine too). A few letter changes and they can be "FX","FI" or any other designation NHRA wants as long as they are not racing "heads up" with the older cars. In the event that NHRA does nothing to reclassify these cars and the "heads up" beatings continue (which they will in the current format), you all should start thinking about other ways to stay competitive (i.e.- lower the horsepower ratings on the older carbureted cars if they are forced to remain in their current classes.) I can't wait to see these very same posts in 10 years (if this stuff still exists) when the DP, CJ and COPO guys are complaining about the (then to be) new cars having too much voltage and making 1100 hp (and hooking) because they have bigger batteries and a 512 bit torque management processor with a 960 hz refresh rate.