HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2014, 01:41 AM   #1
Qwikpony
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Stock Suggestion # 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by FS Fan View Post
The street car versions of performance cars are cnc ported. The Mustang Boss 302 and many Corvette models have cnc heads right from the factory. Having that in Stock isn't a surprise.
The older cars are at least getting that benefit as well. Its called Edelbrock Aluminum Heads (NHRA legal/approved).
Qwikpony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 02:00 AM   #2
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,111
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,814 Times in 413 Posts
Default Re: Stock Suggestion # 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwikpony View Post
The older cars are at least getting that benefit as well. Its called Edelbrock Aluminum Heads (NHRA legal/approved).
It's a minimum 10HP penalty for the Edelbrock/GM head on a big block Chevy in Stock Eliminator. And as an example, the fastest 427/425 69 Camaros in the country, owned by the Sorenson Brothers, and Bobby DeArmond, have iron heads. I'm not at all convinced that the Edelbrock/GM head has done anything for the 427/425 we run. If we go back to the 427/425, it will probably have a set of Jimmy Bridges cast iron heads on it. That head seems to work for the 396/375 though.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 03:44 AM   #3
SS Engine Guy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Stock Suggestion # 1

I thought taking 3 tenths off the indexes was supposed to fix everything? Fell for that one hook, line, and sinker didn't we?
SS Engine Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 09:39 AM   #4
Mike Pearson
VIP Member
 
Mike Pearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 614
Liked 1,919 Times in 576 Posts
Default Re: Stock Suggestion # 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS Engine Guy View Post
I thought taking 3 tenths off the indexes was supposed to fix everything? Fell for that one hook, line, and sinker didn't we?
didn't do a darn ting except lower the car counts due to the bottom of the list qualifiers that could no longer run their indexes. One of the issues with the new cars is the high cost to purchase one and get it into race trim. A new guy starting out cant afford one of these new cars. everyone knows the HP numbers are way out of whack on the new cars even the owners. The qualifying sheet at Indy sure showed that.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS
Mike Pearson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 09:57 AM   #5
Frank Bialas
Member
 
Frank Bialas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 252
Likes: 6
Liked 23 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: Stock Suggestion # 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwikpony View Post
The older cars are at least getting that benefit as well. Its called Edelbrock Aluminum Heads (NHRA legal/approved).
In my case a 29 HP penalty and the Edelbrock aluminum head is NHRA approved but NOT LEGAL AS SOLD!!!
__________________
Frank Bialas 1570 STK
Frank Bialas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 11:23 AM   #6
Henry S
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 11
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Stock Suggestion # 1

I'm sure I will get tarred and feathered for this, but my suggestion would be to make the trigger .50-.60 under. Also I would suggest making the trigger at random races .30-.35 under in the 1/8 mile and may be use both at the same race. I think this would get everybody looked at much sooner and things in line quicker. I agree that the factory shoot out cars should be in there own category. and that the FI cars be placed in there own categories as well.
Henry S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 03:00 PM   #7
Bob Mulry
VIP Member
 
Bob Mulry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
Default Re: Stock Suggestion # 1

On another note..........

What would happen if a racer with a large amount of disposable income purchased a variety of FX cars and ran them balls out at a few Divisional Races?????????????

After the bloodletting the rich racer could take the decreased value as a cost of doing business and write off the loss.............

But the factory probably has a clause in the purchase agreement, which would also include an NDA, that they would only run as fast as necessary to destroy Stock Eliminator...

Just my thoughts,
Bob
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK
A & M Motorsports
Bob Mulry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 03:19 PM   #8
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,351 Times in 553 Posts
Default Re: Stock Suggestion # 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Mulry View Post
But the factory probably has a clause in the purchase agreement, which would also include an NDA, that they would only run as fast as necessary to destroy Stock Eliminator...
Do you also write children's books?
GUMP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2014, 10:10 PM   #9
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Stock Suggestion # 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Mulry View Post
On another note..........

What would happen if a racer with a large amount of disposable income purchased a variety of FX cars and ran them balls out at a few Divisional Races?????????????

After the bloodletting the rich racer could take the decreased value as a cost of doing business and write off the loss.............

But the factory probably has a clause in the purchase agreement, which would also include an NDA, that they would only run as fast as necessary to destroy Stock Eliminator...

Just my thoughts,
Bob
If I ever win the Powerball.......LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2014, 10:32 PM   #10
farmco r/sa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: lakewood, co
Posts: 558
Likes: 302
Liked 147 Times in 54 Posts
Default Re: Stock Suggestion # 1

It just seems to me that the biggest gripe is
that the "FS" cars face no penalty for going
more than - 1.00 under.. I love the new cars,
they are the future and here to stay. The simplest short term
solution to me seems to me at races where FS cars
run let 'em fly...., just do not punish "traditional" cars
with "AHFS"...., let 'em fly as well...? Same rules
for all.... no discriminating......
Hope stock/super stock does not look like comp.
with 1,000 footers.....
__________________
Randy Hyman. Lakewood co. stk 5394
P/SA

Last edited by farmco r/sa; 09-11-2014 at 10:59 PM.
farmco r/sa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.