HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2011, 06:25 PM   #11
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: New class structures

Holy Moly,10 posts and everybodies in sync.Maybe there is hope for us after all.Keep it up.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 04:30 AM   #12
Jimi B
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: New class structures

Actually some pretty good Ideas.

Average fans (more importantly prospective fans) need to relate to the cars more.

Cost needs to come down

Less down time

I like it.
__________________
Jimmy Bowling BF/S 3808

www.facebook.com/jimib1980
Jimi B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 03:22 PM   #13
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: New class structures

Once the "new" rules are in place, put a 2-year moratorium on any performance-affecting rules changes. I get tired of seeing NHRA shooting down effective new combos as soon as they display their effectiveness. Case in point; Brad Perssonnett struggled for YEARS to engineer an effective turbocharged powertrain for his Pro Mod, and never won a race. As SOON as he won ONE RACE (the Indy U.S. Nationals) there was a lot of talk about reducing the size of his turbos... ONE RACE.

I think he may have won another one since then, but I read where NHRA actually did reduce the size of those turbos like from 90's to 88's... after he won two races.

I think that's ridiculous; where are these people when a 2008 supercharged Mustang AA/SA goes 145 mph in AA/SA???

There are some more turbo Pro Mods in testing, right now for this new season, but if NHRA defeats them with new, restrictive rules before they ever hit the track, I think it will put a damper on new development.

There needs to be a period of time when people can count on the rules staying the same for awhile, to give them a chance to work on their combinations. Two years would make sense, to me.

The AHFS, such as it is, would be exempt from this...
__________________
Bill

Last edited by bill dedman; 03-07-2011 at 03:24 PM.
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 03:57 PM   #14
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: New class structures

Quote:
Originally Posted by bill dedman View Post
Once the "new" rules are in place, put a 2-year moratorium on any performance-affecting rules changes. I get tired of seeing NHRA shooting down effective new combos as soon as they display their effectiveness. Case in point; Brad Perssonnett struggled for YEARS to engineer an effective turbocharged powertrain for his Pro Mod, and never won a race. As SOON as he won ONE RACE (the Indy U.S. Nationals) there was a lot of talk about reducing the size of his turbos... ONE RACE.

I think he may have won another one since then, but I read where NHRA actually did reduce the size of those turbos like from 90's to 88's... after he won two races.

I think that's ridiculous; where are these people when a 2008 supercharged Mustang AA/SA goes 145 mph in AA/SA???

There are some more turbo Pro Mods in testing, right now for this new season, but if NHRA defeats them with new, restrictive rules before they ever hit the track, I think it will put a damper on new development.

There needs to be a period of time when people can count on the rules staying the same for awhile, to give them a chance to work on their combinations. Two years would make sense, to me.

The AHFS, such as it is, would be exempt from this...
On this we agree. But even a full year before a change would be a move forward.
I was tossed for an infraction (to little deck height). a month after they tossed me they changed the rule. I never got even a hint of an apoligee. After I spent $300 correcting the supposed infraction.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 06:53 PM   #15
BuzzardBros
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NewJersey
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: New class structures

Ed... Let me get this straight. You want to eliminate TAD/TAFC and combine them with TF & FC. You want them to toss their $80-100 grand operation into the toilet and start from scratch. Their motors are completely different. Not to mention their pit crews. There's only so many T/F crews out there. BTW, I would just love dragging my stuff around to these races because the big sponsors would stay with the cars/people they already have leaving everybody else with absolutely no chance of winning. Pro Stock would encompass the same thing.
You want everyone with the exception of sportsman racers and the richest people in drag racing to en cure no out of pocket money just the low end of the professional ranks to foot the tab. Oh, I get it, you were kidding right.
BuzzardBros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 07:05 PM   #16
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs up Re: New class structures

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuzzardBros View Post
Ed... Let me get this straight. You want to eliminate TAD/TAFC
Hey....Thats a GREAT idea. Why didn't I think of that ! lol
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 07:18 PM   #17
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: New class structures

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuzzardBros View Post
Ed... Let me get this straight. You want to eliminate TAD/TAFC and combine them with TF & FC. You want them to toss their $80-100 grand operation into the toilet and start from scratch. Their motors are completely different. Not to mention their pit crews. There's only so many T/F crews out there. BTW, I would just love dragging my stuff around to these races because the big sponsors would stay with the cars/people they already have leaving everybody else with absolutely no chance of winning. Pro Stock would encompass the same thing.
You want everyone with the exception of sportsman racers and the richest people in drag racing to en cure no out of pocket money just the low end of the professional ranks to foot the tab. Oh, I get it, you were kidding right.
No,I was serious as a heart attack.A lot of the dragsters are injected fuel combos already.
In TA/FC after Frank,everybody else is racing for R/U at a race and #2 in the country.
You'll probably lose some teams.How many competitive teams are in T/F now?How many in F/C?Backing down the fuel cars will open up the amount of cars to fill 28 car fields and maybe make the racing closer and what NHRA wants,more entertaining.After all we're in the entertainment business now.
The budgets would get smaller with the backing down of power and the use of only two engines per race.
Uh,alcohol cars aren't pros,they're supposed to be the top of the sportsman ranks.
I assume that you're either an owner/driver/crew member on an alcohol team.Sorry if you took offense to what I proposed,because it will never happen anyway.
BTW speaking of incurrung expenses.The rest of us lowly sportsman pay into your purse
money.I think we deserve a tip of the hat for that.Your welcomed.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 08:09 PM   #18
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 31
Liked 69 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: New class structures

Both Alky class were design as a minor league system to replenish the major echelons of our sport but now due to the high cost of competing or moving up mostly caused by multiple team ownership with crazy budget, it's no longer possible for them to have a chance to move up as the gap between AA/FC and A/FC has reach unsurmountable proportions. This way someone like Frank Manzo could move up(Parody: just imagine if LeBron James was still playing High School Ball instead of moving up to the pro's, of course he would dominate). Let's nominate Ed as Chairman at NHRA, he wouldn't have to show up but only once a month and could probably cure most of NHRA malignant cancer. You got my vote, maybe have Terry help with the CJ & Challenger Classification. CR
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1109-03839.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	43.4 KB
ID:	6375   Click image for larger version

Name:	1109-01640.jpg
Views:	115
Size:	47.0 KB
ID:	6376  

Last edited by cicero819; 03-07-2011 at 08:20 PM.
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2011, 11:07 AM   #19
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Talking Re: New class structures

Quote:
Originally Posted by cicero819 View Post
Both Alky class were design as a minor league system to replenish the major echelons of our sport but now due to the high cost of competing or moving up mostly caused by multiple team ownership with crazy budget, it's no longer possible for them to have a chance to move up as the gap between AA/FC and A/FC has reach unsurmountable proportions. This way someone like Frank Manzo could move up(Parody: just imagine if LeBron James was still playing High School Ball instead of moving up to the pro's, of course he would dominate). Let's nominate Ed as Chairman at NHRA, he wouldn't have to show up but only once a month and could probably cure most of NHRA malignant cancer. You got my vote, maybe have Terry help with the CJ & Challenger Classification. CR
LOL....you dont want me to go there....they would ALL be in S/S with the correct HP factor.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2011, 04:43 PM   #20
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: New class structures

Quote:
Originally Posted by cicero819 View Post
Both Alky class were design as a minor league system to replenish the major echelons of our sport but now due to the high cost of competing or moving up mostly caused by multiple team ownership with crazy budget, it's no longer possible for them to have a chance to move up as the gap between AA/FC and A/FC has reach unsurmountable proportions. This way someone like Frank Manzo could move up(Parody: just imagine if LeBron James was still playing High School Ball instead of moving up to the pro's, of course he would dominate). Let's nominate Ed as Chairman at NHRA, he wouldn't have to show up but only once a month and could probably cure most of NHRA malignant cancer. You got my vote, maybe have Terry help with the CJ & Challenger Classification. CR
Yes I would.And my first action would be to retire Danny and make a certain fellow from the mountains of East central Pa. national tech director.And Graham's new job would be getting coffee every morning for the new director.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.