HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-01-2014, 05:00 PM   #21
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3,579
Liked 7,654 Times in 1,726 Posts
Default Re: 262 vs 267 sbc

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Feiock View Post
So how does one work around the Dual Jet? Or should I ask how much HP can be made on a carb rated at 287 CFM?

It gets even more interesting if you convert apples to apples. Since a 2BL is flowed at 3 inches vacuum and a 4BL is flowed at 1.5 inches of vacuum, you need to multiply the 2BL CFM by roughly .707 to get a value you can directly compare to a 4BL carb.

So 287 X .707 = 203 CFM

Using a quick online CFM calculator:
267 CID, 5500 RPM, 80% VE........ would need about 350 CFM minimum
Well, let's see, with a (seriously) restricted engine you don't think about making HP. You make as much torque for as long as you can.
I can assure you that a 287 CFM 2V will be flowing at least 100% VE. How can I say that? If everything is right in the combo, the engine WILL be pulling vacuum long before it gets to the finish line. OBTW, try explaining that to the man designing your cam.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 09:01 PM   #22
Dean Feiock
Member
 
Dean Feiock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pierre, SD
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times in 15 Posts
Default Re: 262 vs 267 sbc

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Well, let's see, with a (seriously) restricted engine you don't think about making HP. You make as much torque for as long as you can.
I can assure you that a 287 CFM 2V will be flowing at least 100% VE. How can I say that? If everything is right in the combo, the engine WILL be pulling vacuum long before it gets to the finish line. OBTW, try explaining that to the man designing your cam.
Billy, I understand the VE will be higher. I used a lower number in the calculation just for a number. To use 100% in the calculation would only further show inadequate the carb is.

Since the wife want's to drive and I've acquired another car......I guess I'll take a stab at it.
__________________
Dean Feiock -- Stock 5002
Dean Feiock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 12:04 PM   #23
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 63
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
Default Re: 262 vs 267 sbc

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
I think that the 81-83 267@ 150 HP(79-80 are higher) is softer than the 76 262@ 171 HP.
To give a bit of perspective to what Billy is saying, compare the 267 to a Mopar 273 from the '65-'67 era:

Mopar - 287 max disp, 1.437 B&B carburetor that meters fuel like a straw in the wind, 10.2 compression, .400 lift cam, 176 power rating.

Chev 267 - 280 max disp, 1.375 Dual Jet that meters well, 9.5 compression, .357/.373 cam (heads will flow better on the exhaust than the Mopar), lighter reciprocating weight, better transmission (TH200), 150 power rating.

Not a cake walk, but very possible. The 273 has been beat on since the '70s, so don't expect to achieve the same level of performance in a month.
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 09:35 PM   #24
brian schuetta
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: san antonio tx
Posts: 259
Likes: 5
Liked 28 Times in 15 Posts
Default Re: 262 vs 267 sbc

OK got a 267 block and crank but no heads. 513 castings look like one off deal. Will continue the hunt this weekend.
brian schuetta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 12:36 PM   #25
Mike Taylor 3601
VIP Member
 
Mike Taylor 3601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 337
Liked 279 Times in 96 Posts
Default Re: 262 vs 267 sbc

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Well, let's see, with a (seriously) restricted engine you don't think about making HP. You make as much torque for as long as you can.
I can assure you that a 287 CFM 2V will be flowing at least 100% VE. How can I say that? If everything is right in the combo, the engine WILL be pulling vacuum long before it gets to the finish line. OBTW, try explaining that to the man designing your cam.
What Billy said plus this
carb is rated 287,on dyno with air turbine will pull more than 287 cfm.
Mike Taylor 3601
Mike Taylor 3601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 01:52 PM   #26
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3,579
Liked 7,654 Times in 1,726 Posts
Default Re: 262 vs 267 sbc

Hey Mike, not for nuthin but a 267 and a 4 speed in your car would be a crapper full of fun!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.