262 vs 267 sbc
Which of these is the more under factored and would be worth working with? The 3.50" bore sounds way to small but didn't one of those engines qualify well at Indy one year in an El Camino? Dime rockets or?
|
Re: 262 vs 267 sbc
Call or PM Billy Nees. I think He has experience with both those. He is the expert. PM me and I will give you his number.
|
Re: 262 vs 267 sbc
I think you are referring to an El Camino that had a 262 (4.3) V-6 that was near the top at Indy a few years ago. I think the last name was Fickler. Was the wife of a guy that worked at Aeromotive. Now the best 262 V-8 I know of, is a guy out of Div 1- Brian Philbrick(sp?) out of Ontario, Canada. I have been working on the 267 combination for a little while and have found good things and some bad things about the 267. Some can be cured with money and others, well you just have to live with. The big issue with either combination is going to be finding good cores to work with, especially the 262 V-8. I have collected a bunch of 267 stuff and more carbs than should be allowed in one shop.
|
Re: 262 vs 267 sbc
This is interesting because I saw Briane's (car at the Class Nationals.
We had a short conversation about the small engines. Great guy. Curious these two engines so close in cubic inches. Kind of wonder why GM made them in the first place? Then they the different displacements? Wondering which of these two engines GM used to manufacture the mini LT1? OR was it a whole new bore stock combination? Dan |
Re: 262 vs 267 sbc
Probably an emissions experiment.
|
Re: 262 vs 267 sbc
Mini lt1 different again, went back to 265 same dimensions as the fifties engine.
|
Re: 262 vs 267 sbc
interesting original 265 is 3.75bore X 3 stroke- small dimension rod bearings
262 is 3.67 bore X 3.1 stroke-large dimension rod bearings 267 is 3.5 bore X 3.48 stroke-also large dimension rod bearings 262 was a popular engine in the Monza it replaced a 350 that was substituted at introduction in 1975 due to engine shortages -only available for 2-3 years |
Re: 262 vs 267 sbc
Quote:
|
Re: 262 vs 267 sbc
Quote:
|
Re: 262 vs 267 sbc
Shaw's elCamino was 4.3 v6 (262 cid) with TBI fuel injection.
It's a 350 v8 with two cylinders removed. Everything equal and same displacement, more cylinders will make power than smaller number of cylinders up a v10/v12. More small intake strokes per four stroke cycle makes more power than fewer and larger intake strokes. The carb acts larger than it actually is with more cylinders. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.