|
![]() |
#141 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Also, on the crank, could limit it to 2 inch rod journal, with a max, .060 undersize. And ring widths, say 1\16, 1\16 3\16. But all of this would require tear down, and that's what I want to avoid. Just some thoughts.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#142 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
I think a weight break for older model cars is way over due. I love clutch cars, but I'm trying to get interest. I think getting brodix, and say, Drag Illustrated pushing this would help.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#143 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
What kind of hybrid are we seeking here? Stocker type suspensions with "spec type" engines? Super Stock style suspension with same? Converted bracket cars, that really opens a can of worms. Just a thought, come up with a basic set of "rules" as a guide. Make it a Class Racer stickey? Then we can bench race and tweak them?
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro 95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#144 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belle Vernon, PA
Posts: 288
Likes: 26
Liked 55 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
That ain't gonna fly, that ain't gonna fly
No it didn't work then, and it dont work now But do or die, I'm gonna try To enjoy the ride, all the way down ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#145 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Mike,
You are spot on! I've read every post. Bad back, bad knees and everything else. I'd love to go back to a stick. If someone can pull this off - I will travel . I think the fans would love it as much as us racers. Doyle Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#146 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
It'll never happen. Makes too much sense, and entirely too entertaining, and fun.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#147 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orange City Fl
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I would like to hear what Mike Keener
thought about this thread. He was one of the best when it came to modified racing. Hammer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#148 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
So, what are we talking here.
Are these cars going to required to have full roll cages? 9.0-9.50 lbs - cubic in, max 366 750 cfm carb - whats the FI equivalent? It's a new world, the younger FI guys need to be included? 10.5 tire stock or "stock type" suspension, minor inboard movement of the rear suspension for tire clearence, no FWD conversions $500 claim for cylinder heads-let us run whatever head you want, no porting or polishing, welding, port plates, ect, my point, you blow everybody away, if I'm there, your heads are going home with me Shortblock-stock or steel rods, any compression,stock oiling system, no externals, dry sumps, ect allow 150lb weight break for automatics-only reason I say this, much as we would all like to see a stick only class, there are more autos out there Just a few random thoughts on Sunday. I'm off to the track.
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro 95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#149 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
This much I can tell you from having lived and breathed Super Modified in the beginning and I am sure FJ and Mike will back this up it was not cheap then and hard to police with the rules then. With all the rules everybody wants do you really think NHRA will support this. When Voeglin proposed the first rules in 1974 it was to be a Heads up Elminator just like the first CarCraft Econo Dragster rules around 1971 or 1972!
Just survey Voeglin Daniels FJ Houser Stevens Ed Wright Fadely Keener and Merc only ran SM a short time in 75 They were the Kings of D/MP C/MP and E/MP |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#150 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Super mod was a great class, I'm sure. It was, and still could be very entertaining. But, it didn't have a $500 cylinder head exchange-claimer. That would surely keep the cost down. I'm like the one guy, you dominate, there will be a fight fight those heads. We have to be realistic, and let existing back-halfed cars in. The claimer head rule, is far better then the claim the whole engine rule, or sealed motors.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|