|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orange City Fl
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The old s/m class was a good entry class to mod/elim.
Bring back the class with some rules that can be some what affordable. 10.5 rear tire not 10.5w cast iron head any cast intake no sheet metal. 4-speed trans (like the old days) single 4 bbl carb 850 or less. porting allowed but no welding or epoxy A B C classes like before. Just some ideas... Hammer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wilton,CT
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Liked 185 Times in 54 Posts
|
![]()
Them were the days, with the novas,camaros,mavricks and so on. had a nove back in the mod days.
bob lasko |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Green Creek (Tryon) North Carolina
Posts: 331
Likes: 69
Liked 99 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
I agree fully! I miss modified production in any form.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
I agree with the idea. Make it cheap by making it very limited. Cubic inch and wts. One carb size, No sheet metal manifolds, No Box, Stick or Auto doesnt matter . Stock Crank sizes. Flat top Pistons. Trophy Only prize except contingency. List the bodies legal, Duster, Nova, Camaro. Cage, 4 link, 9 inch rear or 12 bolt or Dana.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 1,289
Liked 1,428 Times in 296 Posts
|
![]()
Sounds fun. The autos don't need the weight subsidy though.
We ran a SS/BS 69 Camaro in the 90's with a stick. Everything in that car was used except the gas and oil. It was still more expensive than a stocker. I love the idea, but it won't be cheap.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
|
![]()
And no FWD-conversion ''jellybean'' cars.
__________________
Mike Carr, Tri-State S/SS Association President Looking for 2015 S/SS Race Sponsors Contact me if interested buffdaddy_1302@hotmail.com (724) 510-5912 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
I agree totally. Not that I'm smack dab in the middle of a 10.5 60 Corvette project, but I love the little motors and manual transmissions. I love Super/Stock and Stock, but if you watch the crowd reaction of, say a 10 Cobalt and then a crowd reaction to a moidified Chevy II or Corvette yankin gears....it's just more exciting. And that's what folks watch racing for....excitment! IMO. I would pay double to watch Modified and/or some type of drag racing where the driver actually did something between the starting line and 1250 feet. I did the S/G stuff, delay box, trans brake, throttle stop, let go of the button, then ride along, manage the finish line and that's it. I belive the enhancements mentioned do indeed provide more consistency. I will be using these in my SS/LA entry. But would love to see the driver be responsible for more of the run. No T-Brake, no air shift. No electronics, no Pneumatics. Just my opinion folks
Wade Mahaffey |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Mike!!
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
what? no amc's!?!?! how about a 410 cid limit? no clutchless transmissions? iron heads?
__________________
without losers,winning means nothing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|