HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-24-2012, 09:55 AM   #141
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Also, on the crank, could limit it to 2 inch rod journal, with a max, .060 undersize. And ring widths, say 1\16, 1\16 3\16. But all of this would require tear down, and that's what I want to avoid. Just some thoughts.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 10:38 AM   #142
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

I think a weight break for older model cars is way over due. I love clutch cars, but I'm trying to get interest. I think getting brodix, and say, Drag Illustrated pushing this would help.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2012, 09:14 AM   #143
Robert Swartz
Senior Member
 
Robert Swartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Kilduff View Post
Excellent ideas.

I don't think giving weight breaks for automatics would be in the best interest of the class. I understand you need participation but the thing that would make a class like this unique-and popular-would be higher rpms and manual transmissions.

At our local tracks the only time a significant number of fans show up is for Pro Mod shows or when the Classic Gearjammers are in town.

I think a 50 lb weight reduction for pre 1973 cars would benfit the class as well.

I really doubt the NHRA would have any interest in such a class-look at how long it took them to bring Pro Mod into the program and they still treat those guys/girls like second rate citizens.

A class like this would certainly have to start at the grass roots level, and that won't be easy. If some people really want to do something like this I'm willing to help in any way possible-I'm in South East NC. I've got one car that could fit this bill, just tell me the rules before it gets to the chassis shop this winter.

And I gotta say I am very suprised Doyle Evans hasn't posted in this thread yet. I know he's reading it and has a '67 Vette just itching for a class like this
I
OK, I've read almost all of this, sounds very interesting. Would it work in this day and age? It's not 1977 any longer. Yes, it would need to be a grass roots level class. Tod and I have a car that would be a good candidate for this. Our 79 Firebird crate project. It's far from completed.

What kind of hybrid are we seeking here? Stocker type suspensions with "spec type" engines? Super Stock style suspension with same? Converted bracket cars, that really opens a can of worms.

Just a thought, come up with a basic set of "rules" as a guide. Make it a Class Racer stickey? Then we can bench race and tweak them?
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro
95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock
Robert Swartz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2012, 01:20 PM   #144
blkjack
Member
 
blkjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belle Vernon, PA
Posts: 288
Likes: 26
Liked 55 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

That ain't gonna fly, that ain't gonna fly
No it didn't work then, and it dont work now
But do or die, I'm gonna try
To enjoy the ride, all the way down
blkjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2012, 03:35 PM   #145
Doyle Evans
Member
 
Doyle Evans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 6 Posts
Thumbs up Re: Bring back super/mod...

Mike,

You are spot on! I've read every post.

Bad back, bad knees and everything else. I'd love to go back to a stick. If someone can pull this off - I will travel . I think the fans would love it as much as us racers.

Doyle







Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Kilduff View Post
Excellent ideas.

I don't think giving weight breaks for automatics would be in the best interest of the class. I understand you need participation but the thing that would make a class like this unique-and popular-would be higher rpms and manual transmissions.

At our local tracks the only time a significant number of fans show up is for Pro Mod shows or when the Classic Gearjammers are in town.

I think a 50 lb weight reduction for pre 1973 cars would benfit the class as well.

I really doubt the NHRA would have any interest in such a class-look at how long it took them to bring Pro Mod into the program and they still treat those guys/girls like second rate citizens.

A class like this would certainly have to start at the grass roots level, and that won't be easy. If some people really want to do something like this I'm willing to help in any way possible-I'm in South East NC. I've got one car that could fit this bill, just tell me the rules before it gets to the chassis shop this winter.

And I gotta say I am very suprised Doyle Evans hasn't posted in this thread yet. I know he's reading it and has a '67 Vette just itching for a class like this
I
Doyle Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 04:47 AM   #146
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

It'll never happen. Makes too much sense, and entirely too entertaining, and fun.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 07:02 AM   #147
John Leichtamer Jr
Senior Member
 
John Leichtamer Jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orange City Fl
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

I would like to hear what Mike Keener
thought about this thread.

He was one of the best when it came
to modified racing.


Hammer
John Leichtamer Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 09:33 AM   #148
Robert Swartz
Senior Member
 
Robert Swartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

So, what are we talking here.

Are these cars going to required to have full roll cages?

9.0-9.50 lbs - cubic in, max 366

750 cfm carb - whats the FI equivalent? It's a new world, the younger FI guys need to be included?

10.5 tire

stock or "stock type" suspension, minor inboard movement of the rear suspension for tire clearence, no FWD conversions

$500 claim for cylinder heads-let us run whatever head you want, no porting or polishing, welding, port plates, ect, my point, you blow everybody away, if I'm there, your heads are going home with me

Shortblock-stock or steel rods, any compression,stock oiling system, no externals, dry sumps, ect

allow 150lb weight break for automatics-only reason I say this, much as we would all like to see a stick only class, there are more autos out there

Just a few random thoughts on Sunday. I'm off to the track.
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro
95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock
Robert Swartz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 10:30 AM   #149
BlueOval Ralph
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

This much I can tell you from having lived and breathed Super Modified in the beginning and I am sure FJ and Mike will back this up it was not cheap then and hard to police with the rules then. With all the rules everybody wants do you really think NHRA will support this. When Voeglin proposed the first rules in 1974 it was to be a Heads up Elminator just like the first CarCraft Econo Dragster rules around 1971 or 1972!

Just survey Voeglin Daniels FJ Houser Stevens Ed Wright Fadely
Keener and Merc only ran SM a short time in 75 They were the Kings of D/MP C/MP and E/MP


Quote:
Originally Posted by John Leichtamer Jr View Post
I would like to hear what Mike Keener
thought about this thread.

He was one of the best when it came
to modified racing.


Hammer
BlueOval Ralph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 12:32 PM   #150
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Bring back super/mod...

Super mod was a great class, I'm sure. It was, and still could be very entertaining. But, it didn't have a $500 cylinder head exchange-claimer. That would surely keep the cost down. I'm like the one guy, you dominate, there will be a fight fight those heads. We have to be realistic, and let existing back-halfed cars in. The claimer head rule, is far better then the claim the whole engine rule, or sealed motors.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.