|
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nicholasville, KY
Posts: 265
Likes: 54
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
I think the Challengers and Cobra Jets are capable of 9.70's in A/SA right now. Probably capable of 9.80's in B/SA. They're holding them back, saving the combination.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
For those not old enough to recall the old stock eliminator.....you were handicapped off the national records. Class winners and low qualifiers made up the eliminator field. Many racers could run under their records and some cars could really bomb the records but usually did not unless there was an eliminator title on the line Yes records counted during big races for a while if it was a final. Setting a record counted for division points......ET or Mph and seperately at one time. People used to just "nip" their record to get the points. Rules were often different at various tracks and events. Some tracks raced under the rules that you could not go under your record by more than a tenth and win except the final.....or even 2 tenths......All this needed changing and the index system was a real good way to do it. It just has not been upraded with the cars performane of today and the AHFS seems like it was a good attempt at evening out the cars that were way off HP wise.....It appears to be causing the class to look foolish with all the shutting off runs at times at a fast race like Indy just was.
No I don't race a stocker anymore but I am an interested observer and have raced a few stockers over the years...,,,and still enjoy watching the category and the cars......
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Bill...that is what I meant. Thanks for the correction. I am 0 for 2 today.
Rich...thanks for the further explanation of how things used to be. It sounds like even back then, sandbagging was a part of class racing. I still love watching Stock and SuperStock. It is just more fun watching them run out the back door. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
No problem... I love those '32 Fords....
![]()
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Ryan, Since I'm new to this sport, started in 1964, I'm glad you explained this style of non-racing to me. All of this is bull s**t! Drag racing is: run all out, get to the stripe first and it's always been that way. You "new wave" racers think it's all about protecting your HP. NO, it's about running as quick as you can and winning or losing. When I first started racing it was off National records, you ran as hard as you could in order to re-set that record and you were proud to see your name in the magazine and paint "NHRA Record Holder" on your car. How proud are you to say that you dumped a race because you were afraid of getting hp? Real Drag Racers run hard to the finish line, the rest of you are just playing some game. JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 312
Likes: 1
Liked 134 Times in 32 Posts
|
![]()
It's to bad that people with a disagreement don't just call one another and settle the problem in private. I was always told that you don't wash your laundry in public. Politics and games have ruined drag racing for the majority of us.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Carrolltown,PA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Balls to the wall,1st. to the strip would be great for stock eliminator,for the 7 or 8 cars that showed up !
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
I have no dog in this hunt. My dogs ain't as good as either. I didn't read the whole string, so bare with me. NHRA considers the 428 with iron heads and aluminum heads as the same instead of two different engines as in the case of the 396 iron/aluminum engines. I think this is wrong and over the last year or maybe longer I have partitioned NHRA to treat the 428 and others and hopefully when (2057) Mopar gets a replacement head ( now that is my dog) that the combo would be treated the same as the Chevy and not the Fords. That is each combo is it's own engine family. If that were done, Charlie & company as well as Hawk & associates could do what they wanted and wouldn't have to type so much. That is the basic's of the problem; the details take to long without refreshment. But I have a new approach; Now that Ford is the car of choice of NHRA, maybe another letter.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Buhler, KS
Posts: 527
Likes: 5
Liked 57 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I would love to see what the AA/ combo would run...juuuuuuust once.
__________________
Mike Voth 5189 GTN - 5188 GTO Voth Racing |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa
Posts: 400
Likes: 7
Liked 115 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
Mike,
Probably 8.90s!
__________________
Evan Smith 1798 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|