|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tightwad,TEXAS
Posts: 911
Likes: 6
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]()
John...Smitty did not say he did not work hard on his combo...he was talking about if he had more money to spend in the car. There is a big difference in the availability and cost of Chevy parts versus a Ford Cleveland engine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gibsonton, FL
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
My point is this, those combos are killer, they continulely dominate classes and the way the rules are set they should be factored, that is all I am saying. Thanks for the motivation however to work on my combo because that is what we plan to do. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: zoo york
Posts: 572
Likes: 3
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]()
Under what reasoning? When you compare the Chevy engine, with a lower deck block, lighter rotating assembly, better parts availability, the advantage is for the Chevy. Do not justify the Cleveland advantage on the cylinder head ports and valve size only.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|