|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 352
Liked 304 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 102
Likes: 31
Liked 73 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
Don't know, I was helping a guy do a freshen up on his combo, got the dial caliper out, told him the lifters were oversized, he said they are fine and to finish the build, so I did and never mentioned it again.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 102
Likes: 31
Liked 73 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
I'm of the opinion that the tech department should put the OE lifter diameter rule in writing right now, and give everyone a year to comply, since it is a labor intensive and costly switch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,106
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It's been common knowledge for DECADES that lifters are to remain OE diameter. Yep, we all know there are a number of cars out there that are running bigger lifters. Again, if you haven't had someone make you a lobe designed to take advantage of it, you're not gaining a thing. It's just like there a number of cars out there with amazingly illegal heads. The rules forbid it, everyone knows it, and some choose to roll the dice. There was once hope that NHRA would police it, they brought Wesley back for a while, but then they over ruled him enough that he quit again. NHRA is extremely unlikely to write any new rules for Stock. That would mean that they would be expected to expend the resources to enforce the rules.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 102
Likes: 31
Liked 73 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, NHRA not likely to invest or do anything to enforce integrity in the class. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|