HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-27-2022, 11:20 AM   #1
Ron Ortiz
Senior Member
 
Ron Ortiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Englewood, Florida
Posts: 989
Likes: 35
Liked 317 Times in 103 Posts
Default Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

OK Bubski, I'll come clean.
THE FORD 302 IS A BOGUS COMBINATION IN U/SA
There, I said it. Now what are you going to do Bubski.
NHRA won't look at numbers or facts.
And I'm sorry for all those other U/SA's out there running a Ford 302. It is a bogus combination from the beginning. You know it, I know it, and so does all other Stock racers.
There, I said it, now Ill go work on my stuff.

Were is Top Fool when you need him.

Ron Ortiz
U/SA. NO2
__________________
Ron Ortiz 2102 STK
Ron Ortiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2022, 11:41 AM   #2
442OLDS
VIP Member
 
442OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
Default Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

Okay,I'll add another one .
When an LS1 engine that is in A/SA in some cars goes into a 2004 GTO and fits E/SA or F/SA,it should be pretty fast
And it is.
442OLDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2022, 12:50 PM   #3
James Perrone
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 3,381
Liked 1,821 Times in 425 Posts
Default Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

Most under rated is 1982-1985 carburetor 305 Camaro
RED camaros with special front bumper that magically make 12 HP disappear by Wednesday
Yes I said it
Next !
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK
James Perrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2022, 01:00 PM   #4
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,640
Likes: 1,937
Liked 10,713 Times in 2,230 Posts
Default Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

I'm a big FE fan
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2022, 02:03 PM   #5
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
Default Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

Those 2015 Challengers and 1970 Cudas are on my list...
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams
NHRA Stock/SS 2007
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2022, 02:35 PM   #6
jmcarter
VIP Member
 
jmcarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,296
Likes: 2,383
Liked 3,180 Times in 972 Posts
Default Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

C’mon guys, a little more Christmas spirit is in order LOL
__________________
Jim Carter
2340 Super Stock
2340 SST/2340 Stock
Set another place at the table
jmcarter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2022, 07:47 PM   #7
Randy Wells
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Warsaw, Mo
Posts: 719
Likes: 640
Liked 1,144 Times in 354 Posts
Default Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

Wow, some of you guys take this stuff way to serious, I guess I am just the guy that gives you that easy round win, but hey I have fun win or loose. Me and my Brother build our own stuff, this year I am going to put a .013 stroke crank, lighter rocker arms, tighter deck, and a new cam and hope to run .75 under will be happy. No funny stuff on the heads. Brother Bob has probably built more engines then most on this forum, a true machinist actually knows how to hold a micrometer, maybe not a horse power guru but his stuff stays together.

Randy Wells
I/S 5628
Randy Wells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2022, 03:14 PM   #8
MR DERBY CITY
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,638
Likes: 1,083
Liked 7,938 Times in 1,519 Posts
Default Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Perrone View Post
Most under rated is 1982-1985 carburetor 305 Camaro
RED camaros with special front bumper that magically make 12 HP disappear by Wednesday
Yes I said it
Next !
WTF James, did someone spike your eggnog. LOL. Happy New Year to the MAD Hawaiian ….
MR DERBY CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2022, 05:35 PM   #9
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,904
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
Default Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

Great. I tried to help.
Now we've got Mr. No Name pitting named racers against one another.
You want me to see if I can get ol' H.P. to kill this thread like he did to the musclecar thread?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 12-27-2022, 06:55 PM   #10
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,826 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Great. I tried to help.
Now we've got Mr. No Name pitting named racers against one another.
You want me to see if I can get ol' H.P. to kill this thread like he did to the musclecar thread?



Named racers can only be pitted against each other if they take the bait and allow it. It's stink bait, just sniff it, and swim away.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.