Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ???

James Perrone · 12-27-2022, 12:50 PM

Most under rated is 1982-1985 carburetor 305 Camaro
RED camaros with special front bumper that magically make 12 HP disappear by Wednesday
Yes I said it
Next !

Larry Hill · 12-27-2022, 01:00 PM

I'm a big FE fan

GUMP · 12-27-2022, 02:03 PM

Those 2015 Challengers and 1970 Cudas are on my list...

jmcarter · 12-27-2022, 02:35 PM

C’mon guys, a little more Christmas spirit is in order LOL

Randy Wells · 12-27-2022, 07:47 PM

Wow, some of you guys take this stuff way to serious, I guess I am just the guy that gives you that easy round win, but hey I have fun win or loose. Me and my Brother build our own stuff, this year I am going to put a .013 stroke crank, lighter rocker arms, tighter deck, and a new cam and hope to run .75 under will be happy. No funny stuff on the heads. Brother Bob has probably built more engines then most on this forum, a true machinist actually knows how to hold a micrometer, maybe not a horse power guru but his stuff stays together.

Randy Wells
I/S 5628

MR DERBY CITY · 12-27-2022, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Perrone

Most under rated is 1982-1985 carburetor 305 Camaro
RED camaros with special front bumper that magically make 12 HP disappear by Wednesday
Yes I said it
Next !

WTF James, did someone spike your eggnog. LOL. Happy New Year to the MAD Hawaiian ….

Mark Yacavone · 12-27-2022, 05:35 PM

Great. I tried to help.
Now we've got Mr. No Name pitting named racers against one another.
You want me to see if I can get ol' H.P. to kill this thread like he did to the musclecar thread?

Alan Roehrich · 12-27-2022, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Great. I tried to help.
Now we've got Mr. No Name pitting named racers against one another.
You want me to see if I can get ol' H.P. to kill this thread like he did to the musclecar thread?

Named racers can only be pitted against each other if they take the bait and allow it. It's stink bait, just sniff it, and swim away.

12-27-2022, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich

Named racers can only be pitted against each other if they take the bait and allow it. It's stink bait, just sniff it, and swim away.

You mean he’s Catfishin?

Frank Castros · 12-27-2022, 07:55 PM

I have always believed that if you don't use your given name you shouldn't be able to post on this forum.
This opinion is not a criticism just an observation.

Bubski makes some very good points but his anonymity is self-serving and all about stirring the pot and nothing more. For me that makes "Bubski" a coward and a colossal jerk.

Bubski, don't go away mad, just go away.

12-27-2022, 12:50 PM	#1
James Perrone VIP Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y. Posts: 1,698 Likes: 3,448 Liked 1,864 Times in 435 Posts	Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ??? Most under rated is 1982-1985 carburetor 305 Camaro RED camaros with special front bumper that magically make 12 HP disappear by Wednesday Yes I said it Next ! __________________ james perrone 1290 STK

12-27-2022, 01:00 PM	#2
Larry Hill Live Reporter Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Hickory, Ky Posts: 10,677 Likes: 1,992 Liked 10,969 Times in 2,261 Posts	Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ??? I'm a big FE fan __________________ IHM Used Parts https://ihmusedparts.com 888-821-1817

12-27-2022, 02:03 PM	#3
GUMP VIP Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: Shelby, NC Posts: 1,832 Likes: 2,195 Liked 2,364 Times in 560 Posts	Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ??? Those 2015 Challengers and 1970 Cudas are on my list... __________________ Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007

12-27-2022, 02:35 PM	#4
jmcarter VIP Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA) Posts: 4,313 Likes: 2,437 Liked 3,240 Times in 986 Posts	Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ??? C’mon guys, a little more Christmas spirit is in order LOL __________________ Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table

12-27-2022, 07:47 PM	#5
Randy Wells Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Warsaw, Mo Posts: 719 Likes: 641 Liked 1,144 Times in 354 Posts	Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ??? Wow, some of you guys take this stuff way to serious, I guess I am just the guy that gives you that easy round win, but hey I have fun win or loose. Me and my Brother build our own stuff, this year I am going to put a .013 stroke crank, lighter rocker arms, tighter deck, and a new cam and hope to run .75 under will be happy. No funny stuff on the heads. Brother Bob has probably built more engines then most on this forum, a true machinist actually knows how to hold a micrometer, maybe not a horse power guru but his stuff stays together. Randy Wells I/S 5628

12-27-2022, 05:35 PM	#7
Mark Yacavone Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Miles From Nowhere Posts: 7,840 Likes: 2,932 Liked 5,149 Times in 1,966 Posts	Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ??? Great. I tried to help. Now we've got Mr. No Name pitting named racers against one another. You want me to see if I can get ol' H.P. to kill this thread like he did to the musclecar thread? __________________ "We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers

12-27-2022, 07:55 PM	#10
Frank Castros VIP Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The Lowcountry. Posts: 3,011 Likes: 2,699 Liked 2,767 Times in 979 Posts	Re: Most Egregiously Enhanced or Under Rated Combo ??? I have always believed that if you don't use your given name you shouldn't be able to post on this forum. This opinion is not a criticism just an observation. Bubski makes some very good points but his anonymity is self-serving and all about stirring the pot and nothing more. For me that makes "Bubski" a coward and a colossal jerk. Bubski, don't go away mad, just go away.