|
![]() |
#11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 37
Likes: 7
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
I have raced stock before and appreciate the class. I was at Indy this year and enjoyed watching as much of class eliminations as I could. I did hear tear downs weren't as strict as they once were, could this be a trend. Let's look at one car I have a 1971 Pontiac Ventura four door. The most power it comes with is a 307 2bbl according to the guides.But I can change the front sheet metal and rear tailights and turn it into a Nova. Then I can claim it as a 1970. Looking at the guide it tells me I can run a 350 factory 300 horsepower with aftermarket heads, only available in a SS two door to my knowledge but it's there. Then it tells me I can run a 402 factory 350 horsepower big block in a 1970 Nova non SS four door, shipping weight 3346.Has anyone ever seen one ? But it's stock legal. But if I showed up with a aftermarket carb on my 307, I'm out of there !
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 500
Likes: 1,028
Liked 988 Times in 272 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The 307 you ran on your Ventura has one of the smallest Rochester 2bbl carbs made. Allowing you to run a different carb would significantly change the hp on that combo. NHRA did "loosen " the carb rules when they allowed you to run a carb with the same venturi and throttle blade size instead of the exact part number. That allowed you to run for example a regular quadrajet on a ram air Pontiac instead of a 2000.00+ carb before you worked on it. Many feel the valve spring rule, roller rockers, solid cams, or even solid rollers in some applications killed the integrity of the class. A spec carb would really throw that over the edge in my opinion. I don’t know why you would need a spec carb unless you.come up a combo where a carb is unobtainable.
__________________
Duane Hoven 1342 SS/GT Last edited by 1347; 09-07-2022 at 12:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#13 | |
Live Reporter
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Western PA
Posts: 455
Likes: 13
Liked 274 Times in 143 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
As far as that Ventura...change it into a Nova and run the 307-2bbl. Lower hp rating whether you run it as a '71 or '72, and it doesn't have to be as heavy. There may even be someone on this forum who runs such a combo... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 37
Likes: 7
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
I really appreciate the comments from knowledgeable people, I want to create a car with some longevity and hope the class is going to have it also. We either have to assume that change has come to an end or if it does come what could it be. The class has to remain viable to racers and most importantly NHRA or they won't keep it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|