HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-29-2021, 02:39 PM   #91
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
Default Re: Can We Un-ring The Bell

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireSale View Post
On the topic of rule roll back, FWD conversion cars have no place in SS/GT or Modified. LS motors come in RWD cars and should not be allowed in FWD vehicles.There is just something wrong about a classic Nova staging against a Cobalt and being given the head start... Put them all in Altered
Why they do not have a place in SS/GT or Modified?
They run a different weight break and HP factor than the RWD cars in SS/GT. The only change they should do in Modified for RWD cars is to allow them to run similar front suspensions as their FWD counterparts.

Last edited by SSDiv6; 12-29-2021 at 02:42 PM.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 12-29-2021, 02:45 PM   #92
Frank Castros
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 2,605
Liked 2,737 Times in 965 Posts
Default Re: Can We Un-ring The Bell

Aren't MOST of the Rule enhancements and Blueprint Specs that have been changed in the past 25-35 years happened because the racers wanted it this way and also because the N.H.R.A. Technical Department can't, couldn't or wouldn't enforce the pre-existing rules anymore.
Including now legal parts revisions, aftermarket parts acceptance, allowable electronics and internal engine and transmission modifications.
I'm only talking about Stock Eliminator, in my humble opinion Super Stock is completely out of control.
Frank Castros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2021, 04:15 PM   #93
FireSale
VIP Member
 
FireSale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 237 Times in 126 Posts
Default Re: Can We Un-ring The Bell

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDiv6 View Post
Why they do not have a place in SS/GT or Modified?
They run a different weight break and HP factor than the RWD cars in SS/GT. The only change they should do in Modified for RWD cars is to allow them to run similar front suspensions as their FWD counterparts.
The rules for GT, Modified Stock and Modified all fall under the general rules for Super Stock. If Super Stock allows it, it's OK in GT, Modified Stock or Modified. FWD conversion cars are not permitted in SS and should not be allowed in the following classes that have to adhere to SS rules. The engine swap in GT came about to allow older SS cars to improve and keep up with modern engines. Before GT, a Nova or Mustang was limited to model year correct power plants.
In short, a Nova with an LS engine makes sense to me and a Sunfire with an LS doesn't.

I really don't like piling on HP in a vintage car and being limited to stock front suspension. There are bracket cars with better and safer front ends than my 68 Mustang.
__________________
Dale Shearon
68 Mustang 6394
FireSale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2021, 04:37 PM   #94
Stan Weiss
Senior Member
 
Stan Weiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
Default Re: Can We Un-ring The Bell

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireSale View Post
The rules for GT, Modified Stock and Modified all fall under the general rules for Super Stock. If Super Stock allows it, it's OK in GT, Modified Stock or Modified. FWD conversion cars are not permitted in SS and should not be allowed in the following classes that have to adhere to SS rules. The engine swap in GT came about to allow older SS cars to improve and keep up with modern engines. Before GT, a Nova or Mustang was limited to model year correct power plants.
In short, a Nova with an LS engine makes sense to me and a Sunfire with an LS doesn't.

I really don't like piling on HP in a vintage car and being limited to stock front suspension. There are bracket cars with better and safer front ends than my 68 Mustang.

Didn't when Pontiac bring back the GTO it have an LS?


Stan
Stan Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2021, 04:49 PM   #95
jamie2370
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 331
Likes: 11
Liked 239 Times in 90 Posts
Default Re: Can We Un-ring The Bell

If thats the logic then I guess we should go ahead and remove trucks from SS as well. I mean who wants to see an s10 with a V8??? I mean it didn't come from the factory with a V8. THAT is the reason GT and Modified came about. So is it just LS engines or ??? Because 90% of the GT cobalts/sunfires/etc have either a carb engine, SBC L98 FI or LT1 FI engines, the modified ones are basically Comp cars with a very small SBC. Ok, I'll quit now lol.
jamie2370 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2021, 05:14 PM   #96
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
Default Re: Can We Un-ring The Bell

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireSale View Post
The rules for GT, Modified Stock and Modified all fall under the general rules for Super Stock. If Super Stock allows it, it's OK in GT, Modified Stock or Modified. FWD conversion cars are not permitted in SS and should not be allowed in the following classes that have to adhere to SS rules. The engine swap in GT came about to allow older SS cars to improve and keep up with modern engines. Before GT, a Nova or Mustang was limited to model year correct power plants.
In short, a Nova with an LS engine makes sense to me and a Sunfire with an LS doesn't.

I really don't like piling on HP in a vintage car and being limited to stock front suspension. There are bracket cars with better and safer front ends than my 68 Mustang.
Your confusion is that Super Stock, although it is a class, it is also a category, just like Stock Eliminator is a category with Stock class, Trucks class, FWD class and Factory Stock.

As I said earlier, yes, RWD in SS/GT and Modified should have the same liberties as the FWD.

By the way, there are front suspension components for your Mustang, used by many in Super Stock that are legal in your car.and the cost is lower than a pair of Santhuff or Lamb struts with springs as used by many in Stock, Super Stock and Factory Stock.

https://opentrackerracing.com/produc...r-control-arms
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2021, 07:16 PM   #97
Jim Caughlin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 685
Likes: 82
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
Default Re: Can We Un-ring The Bell

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireSale View Post
The rules for GT, Modified Stock and Modified all fall under the general rules for Super Stock. If Super Stock allows it, it's OK in GT, Modified Stock or Modified. FWD conversion cars are not permitted in SS and should not be allowed in the following classes that have to adhere to SS rules. The engine swap in GT came about to allow older SS cars to improve and keep up with modern engines. Before GT, a Nova or Mustang was limited to model year correct power plants.
In short, a Nova with an LS engine makes sense to me and a Sunfire with an LS doesn't.

I really don't like piling on HP in a vintage car and being limited to stock front suspension. There are bracket cars with better and safer front ends than my 68 Mustang.
You need to get a rule book and read the classification guide before you make some of these comments. First off, FWD conversion HP ratings are sperate so they don't 'pile on' any RWD combo. Secondly, RWD Modified cars do have looser front suspension rules than a conventional SS class, among other things you can convert to R&P. Thirdly, I have seen cars go in the 8's with SS legal '60's era Ford front suspension so not sure where the issue is, talk to the Thunderbolt guys. FWD conversion rules have been in place since the '80's so it's not like this is some new idea. In the end, everyone picks their poison, live with it. I don't even know why I'm getting in this argument.
Jim Caughlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2021, 08:43 PM   #98
FireSale
VIP Member
 
FireSale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 237 Times in 126 Posts
Default Re: Can We Un-ring The Bell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Weiss View Post
Didn't when Pontiac bring back the GTO it have an LS?


Stan

Yes and it.s a bad *** car, It is Australian and based on the Holden. It's US lineage is Grand Prix Coupe and Firebird.
I'm going to just read here now. It's interesting but I need to keep to myself.
__________________
Dale Shearon
68 Mustang 6394
FireSale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2021, 09:29 PM   #99
Frank Castros
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 2,605
Liked 2,737 Times in 965 Posts
Default Re: Can We Un-ring The Bell

OMG this thread has come apart like a cheap suit.
Frank Castros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2021, 10:26 AM   #100
James Perrone
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 3,394
Liked 1,829 Times in 427 Posts
Default Re: Can We Un-ring The Bell

Firesale. Stop trying so hard to change the world
You seem to talk a lot about something you know nothing about
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK
James Perrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.