|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Well, That looks like all those cars that replaced gear boxes with Rack and Pinion steering and tubular lower control arms will be in the Chassis shops this winter.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 882
Likes: 206
Liked 310 Times in 174 Posts
|
![]()
It has never been legal to replace the steering box with a rack in SS/GT cars or change to tubular a-arms.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 505
Likes: 1,033
Liked 996 Times in 275 Posts
|
![]()
There are cars that have gone to a coil over shock system. We took a set off a car that couldn't get enough travel and went back to Landrum springs and stock components.
__________________
Duane Hoven 1342 SS/GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,580 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I have seen copies of letters from NHRA allowing their use and even had a copy that I received from Alex Denysenko (RIP) of an NHRA letter allowing tubular arms on a late model Mustang. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 882
Likes: 206
Liked 310 Times in 174 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,580 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Have you ever seen part numbers for SFI approved wheels on the accepted parts list? There are lots of parts that are accepted that are not on the list such as the Bump Steer ends that are allowed after many racers showed NHRA the danger and the tendency of the wheel of a car to steer itself after a wheelstand. One of the problems with NHRA is that they perceive any request for the allowance of new parts as a performance advantage. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 505
Likes: 1,033
Liked 996 Times in 275 Posts
|
![]()
Many items that have nothing to do with safety, are argued as a safety item. I remember not that long ago someone trying to say that certain engine components were not for performance, but for economical and safety reasons. That's probably why NHRA perceives it that way
__________________
Duane Hoven 1342 SS/GT |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Because of the R&P on the Gen 4's there were several Gen3's built and approved by a prior Tech group. I had personal experience and argument about it a few years ago.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,580 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Many of the newer cars have stamped front crossmembers/cradles and lower control arms that are weak. The wheelstands will even weaken them more and if you notch them for big pans, they require lots of additional material to reinforce them. It was a war for a Super Stock racer to get NHRA to approve the allowance of aftermarket bump steer kits for safety reasons and it was not until he showed a Tech Division director a car that was at the verge to have a failure that the tech department changed their mind. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 317
Liked 1,103 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
And yet I have see late 90s - early 2000s Camaro & Firebird STOCKERS that had replaced the OE steering box and linkage with a Ford rack & pinion unit. No idea how that ever was allowed.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|