Just when I thought I have seen it all, part two.....

[Toby Lang]

Originally Posted by MR DERBY CITY

Toby, that was my first thought also, that DRC didn't catch it. My sources assure me that he ran SS/ga in Rd. 1. This is a blatant violation of the rules.This scenario is sooo bizarre that many won't believe that it happened.

Does your source work in the tower? Have them come on here and tell us what happened. He may have had SS/GA on his window in round one, but that doesn't mean he was teched into SS/GA. You really think his opponent in round 2 would have said "OK, go ahead and run F, no problem." And as Jim Caughlin said the computer wouldn't have allowed any dial-unders if they were in the same class.

[MR DERBY CITY]

Originally Posted by Toby Lang

Does your source work in the tower? Have them come on here and tell us what happened. He may have had SS/GA on his window in round one, but that doesn't mean he was teched into SS/GA. You really think his opponent in round 2 would have said "OK, go ahead and run F, no problem." And as Jim Caughlin said the computer wouldn't have allowed any dial-unders if they were in the same class.

He may have had SS/ga on his window in round one,but that doesn't mean he was teched into SS/ga....???....

[Toby Lang]

Originally Posted by MR DERBY CITY

He may have had SS/ga on his window in round one,but that doesn't mean he was teched into SS/ga....???....

Sure, why not? Maybe he didn't have time to do it.

Originally Posted by Nitro Joe Jackson

I just checked my edata that i get for stats and the car in question was in SS/FA in round one. Everything looks fine to me.

/thread