HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2016, 01:01 PM   #61
Darrel Goheen
Member
 
Darrel Goheen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 380
Likes: 226
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright View Post
Darrel, some like heads ups.
Anyone with a fast car I'd expect they'd like it.
__________________
Darrel Goheen 785-623-7021
Stock Eliminator 585 94 Camaro Z/28 LT1/ET 585 67 Chevelle 427
Tehnician for JustAnswer.com
Darrel Goheen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 01:10 PM   #62
Michael Beard
VIP Member
 
Michael Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Hoven View Post
Ah NO!!! Go race all the great 10K and up races that Mike Beard talks about all the time. If you want to race stock, there is a chance of heads up in eleminations. If you don't want that, then find another venue. Or build a car that can run classes less populated. Done
I know Todd knows, but for anyone that doesn't: I do support and promote big money bracket races, BUT for totally different reasons. I've never been against heads-up runs. That's part of what makes S/SS special. For years I have advocated for several changes that would reduce the number of classes and therefore increase the likelihood of heads-up runs... but whenever anything like that is proposed, even the "performance eliminator" guys get real quiet.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS
Michael Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 01:34 PM   #63
Sean Cour
Member
 
Sean Cour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 458
Likes: 170
Liked 124 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrel Goheen View Post
I knew about the heads up thing going into stock (because that's what I heard complained about the most) but if the majority (as it seems is the case) would rather not have a heads up race in regular eliminations why not change it? Leaving it like it is just because that's the way it's always been doesn't make it right. Change isn't always a bad thing. I know a guy that only ran his first and last event last year and was unlucky enough to draw a fast heads up first round. I felt really bad for him. He worked his tail off to run stock and then that happened. I'd be surprised if he tries stock again.

I'd be curious to know if the quicker cars in class if the engines were built by the car owners/drivers vs. buying them from a builder. If the latter is true it's just a money class (more money=more performance).

I'd also be curious as to whether stock racers would rather see more stock cars or less at a race. If the latter is true why not change it to run eliminations like they do in the class combo.... Dial everyone at index and whoever gets there first wins. That would make it a true performance class.
Darrel, it's called racing for a reason. It's not supposed to be cheap.
__________________
Sean Cour
T6066 ladle
Sean Cour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 02:34 PM   #64
Darrel Goheen
Member
 
Darrel Goheen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 380
Likes: 226
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Cour View Post
Darrel, it's called racing for a reason. It's not supposed to be cheap.
That is for sure!
__________________
Darrel Goheen 785-623-7021
Stock Eliminator 585 94 Camaro Z/28 LT1/ET 585 67 Chevelle 427
Tehnician for JustAnswer.com
Darrel Goheen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 02:58 PM   #65
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,651
Likes: 1,943
Liked 10,769 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

I have a backyard engine most of it done in my backyard. I have always looked forward to heads up runs. It took me over a year to get the Cuda to run the Index. Every heads up run is a report card on how you and your car are doing against the competition. Class racing is heads up racing at its best The rule book described this before you made the decision to come race. Do what is fun for you.
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 03:19 PM   #66
Paul Merolla
Senior Member
 
Paul Merolla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 611
Likes: 242
Liked 293 Times in 65 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by larry hill View Post
i have a backyard engine most of it done in my backyard. I have always looked forward to heads up runs. It took me over a year to get the cuda to run the index. Every heads up run is a report card on how you and your car are doing against the competition. Class racing is heads up racing at its best the rule book described this before you made the decision to come race. Do what is fun for you.
yes!!!

Last edited by Paul Merolla; 05-06-2016 at 03:34 PM.
Paul Merolla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 03:25 PM   #67
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

I'm curious what majority wants to do away with heads up. Have you taken a poll? I don't get that. To be honest with you if there are no more heads up, why build an expensive bracket car with rules? Why follow the rules? Why not just invite an 9" outlaw tire class to runs heads up, and end stock all together. Just have more Wally days at the local tracks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrel Goheen View Post
I knew about the heads up thing going into stock (because that's what I heard complained about the most) but if the majority (as it seems is the case) would rather not have a heads up race in regular eliminations why not change it? Leaving it like it is just because that's the way it's always been doesn't make it right. Change isn't always a bad thing. I know a guy that only ran his first and last event last year and was unlucky enough to draw a fast heads up first round. I felt really bad for him. He worked his tail off to run stock and then that happened. I'd be surprised if he tries stock again.

I'd be curious to know if the quicker cars in class if the engines were built by the car owners/drivers vs. buying them from a builder. If the latter is true it's just a money class (more money=more performance).

I'd also be curious as to whether stock racers would rather see more stock cars or less at a race. If the latter is true why not change it to run eliminations like they do in the class combo.... Dial everyone at index and whoever gets there first wins. That would make it a true performance class.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 03:27 PM   #68
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

X2!!!!! 👍


Quote:
Originally Posted by larry hill View Post
i have a backyard engine most of it done in my backyard. I have always looked forward to heads up runs. It took me over a year to get the cuda to run the index. Every heads up run is a report card on how you and your car are doing against the competition. Class racing is heads up racing at its best the rule book described this before you made the decision to come race. Do what is fun for you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 03:38 PM   #69
Darrel Goheen
Member
 
Darrel Goheen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 380
Likes: 226
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Hoven View Post
I'm curious what majority wants to do away with heads up. Have you taken a poll?
No I haven't. It just just seems like the majority (that I've talked to) is trying to prevent a heads up. I have never heard of anyone that changed classes hoping to have a heads up race. That's why I asked if that's what the majority would like. I'm not expecting a change unless that's what the majority wants. I knew how it worked when I started stock. Didn't understand why it's like that then and still don't. I'll be at the national open and national event in topeka soon. I'll try to ask a few random drivers in stock or super stock if they are looking for a heads up race or trying to prevent one. Actually I'll start a new thread here and ask.
__________________
Darrel Goheen 785-623-7021
Stock Eliminator 585 94 Camaro Z/28 LT1/ET 585 67 Chevelle 427
Tehnician for JustAnswer.com

Last edited by Darrel Goheen; 05-06-2016 at 03:59 PM.
Darrel Goheen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 04:49 PM   #70
MR DERBY CITY
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,649
Likes: 1,085
Liked 8,023 Times in 1,527 Posts
Default Re: Qualifying with no AHFS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrel Goheen View Post
No I haven't. It just just seems like the majority (that I've talked to) is trying to prevent a heads up. I have never heard of anyone that changed classes hoping to have a heads up race. That's why I asked if that's what the majority would like. I'm not expecting a change unless that's what the majority wants. I knew how it worked when I started stock. Didn't understand why it's like that then and still don't. I'll be at the national open and national event in topeka soon. I'll try to ask a few random drivers in stock or super stock if they are looking for a heads up race or trying to prevent one. Actually I'll start a new thread here and ask.
Darrel with all due RESPECT, how about the majority that don't want a heads up.....Go back to bracket racing at the local track. Bracket 2 Non Delay. This is Stock eliminator , supposedly a Performance Class.....
MR DERBY CITY is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.