HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2014, 09:47 AM   #1
Bunkster
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack McCarthy View Post
....i am sure glad roy WANTED to be part of the 60th Big Fiasco...
Too many don't recall, or aren't aware, of the stock final in 1986.
Bunkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 10:22 AM   #2
Wayne W
Junior Member
 
Wayne W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 91
Likes: 8
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

How about. New cars in Stock and older cars in Jr. Stock ??

Just a thought.
Wayne W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 01:55 PM   #3
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Smile Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne W View Post
How about. New cars in Stock and older cars in Jr. Stock ??

Just a thought.
Good post but a lot of the older car racers have the "EGO" thing. Not a bad thing but its there none the less about being in a "lesser" program. Local racing years ago split the cars into Top Stock, Middle stock, and Jr. Stock. NHRA had Top Stock and Jr. stock because of minor rule differences and tire size but today we have Super Stock. The older cars and the new stuff (2008 and newer) just needs to be factored correctly. The speed difference could be a safety issue. The win and round money wont improve with a new eliminator either. Just thoughts of a long time ago vs today. I hope NHRA gets their act together soon. In my opinion (I know.....that dosent mean poop) the new car factors are not even close yet. Just mentioned some things for the young guys who were not there in the "stone age".
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 02:46 PM   #4
Kenny Wigington
Senior Member
 
Kenny Wigington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cumming,Ga. USA
Posts: 967
Likes: 36
Liked 60 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Just a suggestion, from my little brain. Since the factories have successfully lobbied and gotten the HP ratings they wanted, and they are at the forefront, where they wanted them to be to begin with,let's all get together. All that see this as a grave disservice to the racers that have supported Stock and SS, lets put together a list of names, and comp #'s, and all stay behind it, and send it to NHRA. All of us, realize, that all 3 wanted and got what they wanted, so do us a solid favor, to keep us here. Give us all say.75/second( or something like it) back on our indexes. Lets square this , for all of us. You had an extra $18K from non qualifiers from Indy. That's your icing. Let's share the cake , we all enjoy.

Talk is talk. Lets all do something, and or scuff our shoes in the dirt.
__________________
2894 STK
Kenny Wigington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 02:56 PM   #5
Jim Bailey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 674
Likes: 15
Liked 584 Times in 94 Posts
Cool Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Just do what Tavis and Bruce proposed four (4) years ago...( before it was shot down by the SRAC ). Make the AHFS instant hit at 1.0 second under. Then apply it across the board for all cars in Stock and SS eliminator. This will help factor all soft combos and speed up the process tremendously!
Jim Bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 03:47 PM   #6
FireSale
VIP Member
 
FireSale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 237 Times in 126 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

By the numbers a C/SA running 1.0 under the index is a 10.40 car. The B/SA index is 11.25, so the C/SA car is still a competitive 0.85 under the B/SA index.

How about a variation of the breakout rule where qualifying 1.0 or greater under index bumps the car up a class and 1.0 or more under during eliminations is a breakout loss?

Let the cars at the top of the class ladder qualify against the National record since there's no upper class to bump them to. Or would that just tick people off?

Dale
FireSale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 06:49 PM   #7
AlanPetersJr.
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Hi guys, this has been an interesting read. I'm glad that i grew up in a time
when i watched my dad Al Sr. build and machine his own engines,4 speeds
set up rears cams(you get the picture) I was also fortunate to go to many
Div. 1 races and learn watching all these TOUGH racers work on their cars.
This helped me to prepare my own stock elim. car (thanks Barry & Gary
Parker, Don Scinto, Eddie Bednaz and the rest) To me, making your car
run under or set the record (I did 3 times) is half the fun! The other fun
part is turning on the win light! If I could turn on the time machine I'd proabally
set it to 1970's stock elim (with a 4 speed of course!) I feel that ALL
stockers should play with the same set of rules. Also what about IHRA?
I know the payout is not there,but when the car count goes up, I'm sure the
money will follow.One final thing,I have always felt that NHRA has always
treated the stockers like 2nd class citizens. My form of class racing will
consist of stock / super stock all-star type races, have run racing your
friends. making new ones and maybe win a few bucks.Not feeding the NHRA
money machine... Just my 2 cents Al jr.
AlanPetersJr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 08:24 PM   #8
Marty Knox
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Freeland MI
Posts: 179
Likes: 283
Liked 44 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

What's wrong with Stock? The fact that someone who's smart, and willing to work hard, but can't spend a lot of money has little or no chance of winning.
__________________
Marty Knox 3071 STK
Marty Knox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 08:56 PM   #9
Mike Gray
Senior Member
 
Mike Gray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 617
Likes: 311
Liked 687 Times in 198 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanPetersJr. View Post
One final thing,I have always felt that NHRA has always treated the stockers like 2nd class citizens.
Oh great, and I thought I was treated poorly in super-gas!
I have been working on an older car to run in A, B or C stock. I'm just about to shelve the idea because I'm not sure even my super-gas car could run with the new cars in stock.

Last edited by Mike Gray; 09-03-2014 at 09:01 PM.
Mike Gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 11:05 AM   #10
Rose Racing
Member
 
Rose Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 353
Likes: 95
Liked 226 Times in 74 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunkster View Post
Too many don't recall, or aren't aware, of the stock final in 1986.
fill us in please
Rose Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.