HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-02-2014, 08:12 PM   #1
Jim Caughlin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 685
Likes: 82
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

One thing you Stocker guys might want to consider is unintended consequences. A scenario that I could easily see happening is for NHRA to say "We have listened to our Stock class racers and per their request, we are creating a new separate eliminator for cars newer than 2008." What they are not going to mention is that a proportional amount of the payout and a good chunk of the contingiency money will be going with it. You don't really think that NHRA is going to add a new elimanator and just add the money accordingly? Also, dig out some of your older Natl Dragsters and look how contingiency money has been redistributed over the last few years, money has been added for the new cars at the expense of the older combinations. Don't be fooled by press releases about how the manufacturers are adding contingiency, it's all being feed into the new cars and dropped from the older cars. I race in SS and it doesn't seem to be as big of a deal for us but Stock needs to be careful about what they wish for, I think you guys are being set up.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019
Jim Caughlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 09:37 PM   #2
jmantle
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Black Creek, BC Canada
Posts: 331
Likes: 79
Liked 172 Times in 81 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Caughlin View Post
One thing you Stocker guys might want to consider is unintended consequences. A scenario that I could easily see happening is for NHRA to say "We have listened to our Stock class racers and per their request, we are creating a new separate eliminator for cars newer than 2008." What they are not going to mention is that a proportional amount of the payout and a good chunk of the contingiency money will be going with it. You don't really think that NHRA is going to add a new elimanator and just add the money accordingly? Also, dig out some of your older Natl Dragsters and look how contingiency money has been redistributed over the last few years, money has been added for the new cars at the expense of the older combinations. Don't be fooled by press releases about how the manufacturers are adding contingiency, it's all being feed into the new cars and dropped from the older cars. I race in SS and it doesn't seem to be as big of a deal for us but Stock needs to be careful about what they wish for, I think you guys are being set up.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019
Jim, I think what most stock racers would like to see is put the factory hot rods in SS, be it FX or whatever, and add the real stockers to the guide and let the AHFS work. I know Jeff Teuton managed to get Chrysler to add a few to the guide, I'd like to see NHRA pressure Ford and GM to do the same.

Jim Mantle
V/SA 6632
jmantle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 09:53 PM   #3
Pedigo Perf
Member
 
Pedigo Perf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wichita Ks
Posts: 383
Likes: 70
Liked 30 Times in 17 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Caughlin View Post
One thing you Stocker guys might want to consider is unintended consequences. A scenario that I could easily see happening is for NHRA to say "We have listened to our Stock class racers and per their request, we are creating a new separate eliminator for cars newer than 2008." What they are not going to mention is that a proportional amount of the payout and a good chunk of the contingiency money will be going with it. You don't really think that NHRA is going to add a new elimanator and just add the money accordingly? Also, dig out some of your older Natl Dragsters and look how contingiency money has been redistributed over the last few years, money has been added for the new cars at the expense of the older combinations. Don't be fooled by press releases about how the manufacturers are adding contingiency, it's all being feed into the new cars and dropped from the older cars. I race in SS and it doesn't seem to be as big of a deal for us but Stock needs to be careful about what they wish for, I think you guys are being set up.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019

Bill Lumbergh: Great.
Dom Portwood: So, uh, Milton has been let go?
Bob Slydell: Well, just a second there, professor. We, uh, we fixed the *glitch*. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore, so it'll just work itself out naturally.
Bob Porter: We always like to avoid confrontation, whenever possible. Problem is solved from your end.
Pedigo Perf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 08:53 AM   #4
ss wannabee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

FS Fan has a nice post and I'll have to re-read it...Not trying to beat you up on the details,
BUT I think the LAST carbureted Domestic production-line car MAY have been the 1990
Olds full-size Custom Cruiser wagon with the 307 engine...(and Quadrajet)....

Think the rest of the Big-3 had switched to TBI and Port-Fuel Injection by then...not sure
why Olds hung-on with the 4-bbl engine.....
ss wannabee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 09:25 AM   #5
Bill Diehl
Member
 
Bill Diehl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 311
Likes: 2
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

That CJ stocker, with the same engine platform and 60 more cubes, almost 15 to 1, 650 roller, cnc modern heads with 150 more cfm, and twice the throttle bore opening only makes 100 more HP than mine?

I might as well leave my half finished Boss in the garage then.

Don't get me wrong, I like the new tech just as much as the next guy, but lets get real here. I would like to show the world how smart I am and qualify at the top of the pack too, but how is that going to happen if they don't take a "hit" like I would if I did?

carry on
Bill Diehl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 09:21 AM   #6
Keith 944
VIP Member
 
Keith 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dela-where?
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 1,162
Liked 1,880 Times in 578 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedigo Perf View Post
Bill Lumbergh: Great.
Dom Portwood: So, uh, Milton has been let go?
Bob Slydell: Well, just a second there, professor. We, uh, we fixed the *glitch*. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore, so it'll just work itself out naturally.
Bob Porter: We always like to avoid confrontation, whenever possible. Problem is solved from your end.
one thing not mentioned here, he eventually burned the place to the ground!
lmao
__________________
KEITH MAYERS
2-1/2 X somebody
Still many X nobody
Keith 944 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 11:32 AM   #7
Jim Kaekel
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 133
Liked 535 Times in 110 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedigo Perf View Post
Bill Lumbergh: Great.
Dom Portwood: So, uh, Milton has been let go?
Bob Slydell: Well, just a second there, professor. We, uh, we fixed the *glitch*. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore, so it'll just work itself out naturally.
Bob Porter: We always like to avoid confrontation, whenever possible. Problem is solved from your end.
Awesome, Tracy. Is that from "Office Space" or from an NHRA board meeting?
__________________
Jim Kaekel 3836 STK
Jim Kaekel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 11:41 AM   #8
Run to Rund
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 583
Likes: 8
Liked 54 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: What's wrong with Stock?

Many interesting older cars from the days of gross HP ratings aren't competitive and NHRA has never addressed lowering their ratings to get more "diversity" in Stock. Now we have the factory ratings going very far the other way, making everything that is old relatively uncompetitive. To make it even worse, turbo and supercharged cars don't lose power with elevation anywhere near what naturally aspirated engines do, so they are heavily favored at high altitude tracks.
Run to Rund is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.