HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-2014, 11:20 PM   #1
Bill Bogues
Member
 
Bill Bogues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bethany La.
Posts: 323
Likes: 96
Liked 169 Times in 53 Posts
Smile sbc stocker valve springs

Anyone willing to share what spring is being run on 305-350 engines. I try to get 200 closed and 400 open on our engines , but it's hard to get that much pressure without adding over .200 worth of shims. I've been running the 941 Comp springs but there too close to coil bind to suit me.Is there anything out there in a 1.260-1.290 spring that has around 200lbs@ 1.800 --400@1.400. Thanks for any replies. Bill
__________________
Bill Bogues 4696 STK
Bill Bogues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 12:56 AM   #2
CrateCamaro
Member
 
CrateCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: sbc stocker valve springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bogues View Post
Anyone willing to share what spring is being run on 305-350 engines. I try to get 200 closed and 400 open on our engines , but it's hard to get that much pressure without adding over .200 worth of shims. I've been running the 941 Comp springs but there too close to coil bind to suit me.Is there anything out there in a 1.260-1.290 spring that has around 200lbs@ 1.800 --400@1.400. Thanks for any replies. Bill
Isky make a good spring. Made the change from K-Motion to Isky Tool Room and live increased 3x. 200 on the seat at 1.800 might not be achievable but if it needs that kind of seat pressure maybe look at some lighter valve train components within the rules of course. Lol
__________________
Tony Valerio 1968 Camaro
1700 IHRA H/CM
1701 NHRA SS/?A
CrateCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 08:53 AM   #3
james schaechter
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 1,293
Liked 1,436 Times in 299 Posts
Default Re: sbc stocker valve springs

PAC 1409X beehive. They are the new version of the very good 1409. They just start out higher with the same spring rate. If you have not checked them out, they are worth a look. We beat the crap out of them and they are really good and durable.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK
james schaechter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 01:12 PM   #4
Glenn Briglio
VIP Member
 
Glenn Briglio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massapequa Park,NY
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 1,903
Liked 973 Times in 310 Posts
Default Re: sbc stocker valve springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by james schaechter View Post
PAC 1409X beehive. They are the new version of the very good 1409. They just start out higher with the same spring rate. If you have not checked them out, they are worth a look. We beat the crap out of them and they are really good and durable.
Yupp what James said.
__________________
1989 Camaro Iroc-Z I/SA B&B Auto Machine Shop.
Glenn Briglio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 01:42 PM   #5
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 529
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
Default Re: sbc stocker valve springs

get em cryod too
FED 387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 08:36 PM   #6
tj310
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dresden On. Canada
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: sbc stocker valve springs

http://www.speedwaymotors.com/search.html?query=915-760 decreased height locks---Trevor
tj310 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 09:05 PM   #7
Tim H
VIP Member
 
Tim H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 1,076
Liked 482 Times in 159 Posts
Default Re: sbc stocker valve springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tj310 View Post
Not sure if I would feel confident using those locks on stout stocker springs,but that is just me.
Tim H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 09:10 PM   #8
james schaechter
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 1,293
Liked 1,436 Times in 299 Posts
Default Re: sbc stocker valve springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Briglio View Post
Yupp what James said.
The nice thing about the beehive springs is that they are also lighter. PAC has the lightest design retainers as well. Light + Strong =Fun!



__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK

Last edited by james schaechter; 02-19-2014 at 09:14 PM.
james schaechter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 10:22 PM   #9
derl
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: sbc stocker valve springs

how about the 1218x pac beehive?
derl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 11:35 PM   #10
james schaechter
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 1,293
Liked 1,436 Times in 299 Posts
Default Re: sbc stocker valve springs

I am sure the 1218x is a good spring for it's application. I have not tested it. I will say this. That spring has a lower closed pressure and a much lower spring rate. I would not use something that low in any of our stuff. Remember that some of the lowlift stuff like we run. 399 lift for example requires a cam lobe that is pretty square. The higher pressure is necessary to keep the lifter on thecam. Floating valves is a bad bad deal. There is no shortcut. You need to maximize your valvetrain to make power and also to prevent breakage. The 1409 and now 1409x is designed for the abuse we give them.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK

Last edited by james schaechter; 02-19-2014 at 11:53 PM.
james schaechter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.