HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-18-2014, 10:16 AM   #11
Jim Cimarolli
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 743
Likes: 146
Liked 166 Times in 46 Posts
Default Re: front end 69 nova

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcashman View Post
What is the point of the longer ball joints?
They help to keep the camber from going off the radar at full lift.
Jim Cimarolli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2014, 10:31 AM   #12
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,577
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: front end 69 nova

The idea behind all of this is to reduce the friction, so that the front suspension moves freely, allowing the shocks to have complete control. It makes the front end motion very consistent and repeatable. The other part, as Jim said, is the longer upper ball joints keep the camber from making radical changes as the front end moves through its range of travel.

Another added bonus is increased front end travel. Combine this with the correct springs (which should lower the static ride height considerably, 1" to 2") and a set of shocks such as Santhuffs, and you have a front suspension that you can count on to allow the car to leave hard with the rear tires planted, yet remain easily controllable and driveable.

With offset upper control arm shafts for extra alignment adjustment, you can get the car to track straight consistently. They recently allowed aftermarket parts to reduce bump steer as well.

Find a shop that knows what they're doing, have the front end aligned with your weight in the driver's seat, you want no more than 1/8" toe in, 6 degrees or more positive caster, and zero degrees camber, at around 2" above static ride height, because you want the alignment as close to perfect as possible at the ride height the car has going done the track.

One thing I left out of this post, and a good racer reminded me of it, was that the Nova has less clearance than a Camaro, so you may not be able to run the exact caster and camber settings. You'll need to make the adjustments and then check carefully for clearance to make sure you do not create a tire clearance problem.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S

Last edited by Alan Roehrich; 01-18-2014 at 11:17 AM.
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2014, 08:52 PM   #13
J&S Racing
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 283
Likes: 102
Liked 319 Times in 82 Posts
Default Re: front end 69 nova

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1534 (800x600).jpg
Views:	248
Size:	235.8 KB
ID:	22650

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1535 (800x600).jpg
Views:	251
Size:	243.2 KB
ID:	22651

Did the install on mine today. Overall not that bad.
J&S Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2014, 11:43 AM   #14
joe cool
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: southwest iowa
Posts: 53
Likes: 3
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: front end 69 nova

Sorry for all the dumb questions,With increased travel do you end up with a bumpsteer problem?
joe cool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2014, 12:01 PM   #15
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,577
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: front end 69 nova

Quote:
Originally Posted by joe cool View Post
Sorry for all the dumb questions,With increased travel do you end up with a bumpsteer problem?
You might. You can buy a bump steer kit to solve that problem, they're legal in Stock now.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2014, 04:03 PM   #16
Stockerchevy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: front end 69 nova

Has anybody had any binding issues with the .90 long proforged 101-10017 with stock control arms? I assume the upper bumpers would be the defining length on how far the upper A-Arms can stretch and work before excessive negative camber becomes an issue?

Jim
Stockerchevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.