|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 785
Likes: 45
Liked 316 Times in 67 Posts
|
![]()
Generally a "piece of paper" approving something hasn't held much sway with tech. Just sayin'
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Rich Taylor I/SA - 321 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
|
![]()
I'm thinking NHRA didn't tell these manufacturers that they needed etched I.D. proof on every piece of the tethers. This deal certainly isn't the fault of the tether manufacturers. Once again we have seven divisions with seven different ideas of how one rule should be implemented. It's the computer age guys! Lack of communications strikes again! Jim
.
__________________
Jim Wahl....NHRA #2239 S/SS - IHRA # 8 Stock, D2 Stock Champion (forever I guess) 2019 Baby Gators Stock Champion 2009 NHRA D2 National Open Stock Champion 1982 NHRA D2 West Palm Beach LDRS SS Runner Up Past President, Southern Stock / Super Stock Association. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cleves, OH
Posts: 141
Likes: 318
Liked 85 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
I have to believe that, "every" manufacturer seeking approval submitted a sample of "every" model to NHRA for approval and that NHRA, subsequently, issued the approvals based on the samples submitted. I further doubt that "any" of the approved manufacturers would then, on their own, deviate from the approved sample that they had submitted by altering the product shipped to their customer. Following that logic only leaves the possibility of a lower level official adding his or her own interpretation to the approved description and none of us have ever even heard of that happening. LOL
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|