|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 221
Likes: 50
Liked 38 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.nhra.net/tech_specs/class...s/2014FORD.xls http://www.nhra.net/tech_specs/engin...ts/FORD-14.rtf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
1964-1966 Chevy Chevelle HP change in the guide from 220 to 217 in SS as of 1-1-14, but not listed in the new adjustments just released? Tom
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK Last edited by Tom Moock; 12-19-2013 at 08:44 PM. Reason: forgot SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 936
Likes: 78
Liked 354 Times in 120 Posts
|
![]()
1964-1966 Chevy Chevelle HP change in the guide from 220 to 217 in SS as of 1-1-14, but not listed in the new adjustments just released? Tom
__________________ Same engine in a chevy II is 236 that's 19 hp less. So if I would race a chevelle in SS/LA a 13 lb class it could be 247 lb lighter than a chevy II with the same engine. How much ET would that be worth .Also why would you what to run SS/LA when you could run SS/MA where there is 4 tenths difference in index and only 2 tenths between L and K. Tom
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ??? Last edited by Tom Meyer; 12-21-2013 at 02:25 PM. Reason: added more |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Tom,
If you can get a '65 Chevelle down to 2990 with driver for SS/LA -- you be cheatin'. Time to break out the old 4-door again. When we last ran it, it was 3460 lbs. for SS/MA. Now, it's only 3425 lbs. for SS/NA, and 3210 for SS/MA. But heck, racing the Chevelle against your Nova II is like a Clydesdale against a throughbred. You deserve at least some of that 17 HP. \ Jerry |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|