|
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 221
Likes: 50
Liked 38 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.nhra.net/tech_specs/class...s/2014FORD.xls http://www.nhra.net/tech_specs/engin...ts/FORD-14.rtf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 221
Likes: 50
Liked 38 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Shipping weight was raised compared to 13, so the 14 can fit in C, or even D if a stick. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
1964-1966 Chevy Chevelle HP change in the guide from 220 to 217 in SS as of 1-1-14, but not listed in the new adjustments just released? Tom
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK Last edited by Tom Moock; 12-19-2013 at 08:44 PM. Reason: forgot SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 936
Likes: 78
Liked 351 Times in 120 Posts
|
![]()
1964-1966 Chevy Chevelle HP change in the guide from 220 to 217 in SS as of 1-1-14, but not listed in the new adjustments just released? Tom
__________________ Same engine in a chevy II is 236 that's 19 hp less. So if I would race a chevelle in SS/LA a 13 lb class it could be 247 lb lighter than a chevy II with the same engine. How much ET would that be worth .Also why would you what to run SS/LA when you could run SS/MA where there is 4 tenths difference in index and only 2 tenths between L and K. Tom
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ??? Last edited by Tom Meyer; 12-21-2013 at 02:25 PM. Reason: added more |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Tom,
If you can get a '65 Chevelle down to 2990 with driver for SS/LA -- you be cheatin'. Time to break out the old 4-door again. When we last ran it, it was 3460 lbs. for SS/MA. Now, it's only 3425 lbs. for SS/NA, and 3210 for SS/MA. But heck, racing the Chevelle against your Nova II is like a Clydesdale against a throughbred. You deserve at least some of that 17 HP. \ Jerry |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 99
Likes: 19
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
deleted
__________________
Mike Semeniuk 632 GTMA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Jerry, 283 SS chevelle 217 Hp, Impala 229 Hp, Chevy ll 236 Hp, Tom
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 936
Likes: 78
Liked 351 Times in 120 Posts
|
![]()
I am not bitching we race the cars we like, I was just stirring the pot a little. The hard top chevy IIs with the current hp rating of 236 with a auto and current weight per hp is 11.99 that makes it a j car with a min weight of 2765 and if you can get a chevy II down to that you would be cheating too. In GT the hp on the 283s is 233. Tom
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ??? Last edited by Tom Meyer; 12-20-2013 at 09:31 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Both Tom's,
Of course you know that I know it isn't right. The Chevy II's were one of the first cars "kinda" factored way back in the early eighties when they set the index for SS/LA at 11.75. That was done because at the time the Nova's were somewhat dominant I guess. But it wasn't fair to get the lower index and then get factored hard too. But ya gotta remember, we were all at 235 HP at one time. That's why we built the Olds. There was no way we could keep up with the 307's back then at 3460 lbs.. Now, even though the Olds is fast, at 217 HP I'm pretty sure the 4-door will run right with it.. Jerry |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|