Pure Stockers New Camshaft Rule !!!

[HandOverFist]

Keep in mind a email assurance does not hold the sway of a rulebook. Tech inspectors do not carry copies of emails.

"Stock replacement per OEM spec. and must check on factory spec. open and closed pressure."

[Dan Fahey]

Originally Posted by HandOverFist

Keep in mind a email assurance does not hold the sway of a rulebook. Tech inspectors do not carry copies of emails.

"Stock replacement per OEM spec. and must check on factory spec. open and closed pressure."

YES..just sent him another email asking that question.

As for 10 Second Pure Stockers.

Here is a link of the first 9 Second ET in Stock history.
Bobby DeArmond...May 9, 2001
http://www.nhra.net/fedmog/2001/news/may/050901.html

Dan


D

[ALMACK]

Do I have to e-mail Mike Baker to get the spring pressure numbers for my car ?

I sure hope IHRA leaves the indexes alone and just adjust the super fast PS combos with h.p.

If IHRA changes the indexes, I will probably just upgrade my Mustang to NHRA Stocker specs.

[Dan Fahey]

OK..Mike just emailed me again.

So long as the Spring fits in the Original Stock Pad.
The Spring is legal.

More cam and spring would eventually necessitate resetting the Pure Stock Indexes.
Kind of wished they did not do that. We are in Junior Stock Range.
Keeping the Stock Spring pressure would add only a little HP.
This change Pure Stock should be renamed Jr Stock again!

err

Dan

[ALMACK]

Originally Posted by Dan Fahey

OK..Mike just emailed me again.

So long as the Spring fits in the Original Stock Pad.
The Spring is legal.

More cam and spring would eventually necessitate resetting the Pure Stock Indexes.

Kind of wished they did not do that. We are in Junior Stock Range.
Maybe Pure Stock should be renamed Jr Stock again!

err

Dan

Interesting.
Then there should be an amendment to the specs book stating:

"So long as the Spring fits in the Original Stock Pad.
The Spring is legal."

As posted before in this thread, I would think the rulebook trumps any e-mail on raceday in the teardown area.

[Dan Fahey]

Originally Posted by ALMACK

Interesting.
Then there should be an amendment to the specs book stating:

"So long as the Spring fits in the Original Stock Pad.
The Spring is legal."

As posted before in this thread, I would think the rulebook trumps any e-mail on raceday in the teardown area.

I agree...

So what will be the difference now between what a Pure Stock cam is and what a "normal" Stocker runs? Sounds like to me it will be the same cam. How much do you expect it to pick up the typical combination (if there is such a thing)?

The more I've thought about this today the less of a good idea I think it is.

Scott

[Bobby DiDomenico]

Originally Posted by Tar Heel

So what will be the difference now between what a Pure Stock cam is and what a "normal" Stocker runs? Sounds like to me it will be the same cam. How much do you expect it to pick up the typical combination (if there is such a thing)?

The more I've thought about this today the less of a good idea I think it is.

Scott

Agree. Might be easier for tech, but now it would just be stock eliminator with mufflers?