Reformating LODRS

Doug McCue · 07-31-2013, 11:39 AM

How about adding 1/2 the points that a regular points meet gives to National Opens, so there is more opportunity to make points without having to drive through two states to get to a Points meet?

Chad Rhodes · 07-31-2013, 12:29 PM

I think that adding a division or two so that people can make more races with less towing miles. Also with the regional series for the alcohol cars, open it up for more points races in a division with lower cost to track owners.

Keith 944 · 07-31-2013, 12:36 PM

make ALL NHRA divisional races doubles. that would solve a lot of issues. this was IHRA's best idea to date.

Lyn Smith · 07-31-2013, 02:07 PM

Doubles! they have a hard time just getting one race in. remember IHRA points races only have 25 % of the cars a NHRA race has.

boster · 07-31-2013, 02:54 PM

Pay some real money to the winners. That would really work say 5k to win

Keith 944 · 07-31-2013, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lyn Smith

Doubles! they have a hard time just getting one race in. remember IHRA points races only have 25 % of the cars a NHRA race has.

I know they could do it. most people get to these things on wed. anyway. Friday,2 time runs and into the race. one race on sat. one on sunday. exceptions being rain, then they would have to move schedule around....it can be done

442OLDS · 07-31-2013, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith 944

I know they could do it. most people get to these things on wed. anyway. Friday,2 time runs and into the race. one race on sat. one on sunday. exceptions being rain, then they would have to move schedule around....it can be done

Just how many NHRA Division 3 points races have you been to?

While I like the idea of two races in one weekend,there is NO WAY that it could be done at most races.

When you have so many cars,so many classes,shootouts,snowmobiles,and a usual bit of rain,it is hard enough to get ONE race finished.

DBi Racing · 07-31-2013, 10:07 PM

I like Chad's idea of adding more divisions. That would help cut down on traveling costs and time off of work. Maybe split D-1 and D-2 into three divisions. (D-1 would be Maryland north, new D-2 would be maybe NC, VA, east TN and KY, and the new D-3 would be SC south) Maybe the same thing can be done with the current D-3 and D-5 by splitting them into three divisions as well. (New D-4 would be MI, IN, OH, new D-5 would be MN, WI, IL maybe IA, and new D-6 would be the western half of the old D-5) Not sure if I can help the other divisions shrink.

I think the doubles idea might work but only at events that don't have alcohol cars. And that's a maybe. I like the idea of 1 or 2 Q runs Friday, 1 Saturday morning and right into the race, but I think if you do doubles you gotta start race 2 Saturday night and eliminate all the shootouts.

And yes, increased payouts would most definitely help, but lets be honest...that's not going to happen!

Bill Lent
O/SA 3158

Bobby Fazio · 08-01-2013, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boster

Pay some real money to the winners. That would really work say 5k to win

What you don't like going 5 rounds to get your entry fee back?

Dick Butler · 08-01-2013, 08:29 AM

I think points meets are the Sportsman place to play. Long ago the decision was made to make Sportsman a "participant" area. More classes to get more entries, More forms of cars and now snow mobiles to get one thing, Money for the event. The decision was made to end advertising for spectators as it was realized only the racers would understand the dial in format. ( like the week end brackets at most tracks). At a track or division with 1/2the cars a double can work to both advantage. One race weekend double entry money for one event time, a winner for NHRA too.
This cannot work at Div 3 or 1 with car counts.
If a big Money sponsor would step up to pay NHRA and racers another class would be added. (T/S, T/D)

07-31-2013, 11:39 AM	#1
Doug McCue Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 232 Likes: 7 Liked 13 Times in 2 Posts	Reformating LODRS How about adding 1/2 the points that a regular points meet gives to National Opens, so there is more opportunity to make points without having to drive through two states to get to a Points meet?

07-31-2013, 12:29 PM	#2
Chad Rhodes VIP Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL Posts: 2,375 Likes: 0 Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts	Re: Reformating LODRS I think that adding a division or two so that people can make more races with less towing miles. Also with the regional series for the alcohol cars, open it up for more points races in a division with lower cost to track owners. __________________ Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA

07-31-2013, 12:36 PM	#3
Keith 944 VIP Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Dela-where? Posts: 2,193 Likes: 1,160 Liked 1,877 Times in 577 Posts	Re: Reformating LODRS make ALL NHRA divisional races doubles. that would solve a lot of issues. this was IHRA's best idea to date. __________________ KEITH MAYERS 2-1/2 X somebody Still many X nobody

07-31-2013, 02:07 PM	#4
Lyn Smith VIP Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Pontiac,il. Posts: 1,199 Likes: 282 Liked 966 Times in 194 Posts	Re: Reformating LODRS Doubles! they have a hard time just getting one race in. remember IHRA points races only have 25 % of the cars a NHRA race has.

07-31-2013, 02:54 PM	#5
boster Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: usa Posts: 958 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Reformating LODRS Pay some real money to the winners. That would really work say 5k to win __________________ Bo Kenney

07-31-2013, 10:07 PM	#8
DBi Racing Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 23 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Reformating LODRS I like Chad's idea of adding more divisions. That would help cut down on traveling costs and time off of work. Maybe split D-1 and D-2 into three divisions. (D-1 would be Maryland north, new D-2 would be maybe NC, VA, east TN and KY, and the new D-3 would be SC south) Maybe the same thing can be done with the current D-3 and D-5 by splitting them into three divisions as well. (New D-4 would be MI, IN, OH, new D-5 would be MN, WI, IL maybe IA, and new D-6 would be the western half of the old D-5) Not sure if I can help the other divisions shrink. I think the doubles idea might work but only at events that don't have alcohol cars. And that's a maybe. I like the idea of 1 or 2 Q runs Friday, 1 Saturday morning and right into the race, but I think if you do doubles you gotta start race 2 Saturday night and eliminate all the shootouts. And yes, increased payouts would most definitely help, but lets be honest...that's not going to happen! Bill Lent O/SA 3158

08-01-2013, 08:29 AM	#10
Dick Butler VIP Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Richmond Indiana Posts: 1,196 Likes: 5 Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts	Re: Reformating LODRS I think points meets are the Sportsman place to play. Long ago the decision was made to make Sportsman a "participant" area. More classes to get more entries, More forms of cars and now snow mobiles to get one thing, Money for the event. The decision was made to end advertising for spectators as it was realized only the racers would understand the dial in format. ( like the week end brackets at most tracks). At a track or division with 1/2the cars a double can work to both advantage. One race weekend double entry money for one event time, a winner for NHRA too. This cannot work at Div 3 or 1 with car counts. If a big Money sponsor would step up to pay NHRA and racers another class would be added. (T/S, T/D)