|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toms River NJ
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 415
Liked 53 Times in 25 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dennis P Chapman 1904 STK NHRA National Record Holder Car Owner. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
One issue is the $ fears. Many think S and SS needs to be affordable by everyone. Bracket racing IS affordable for anyone. Thats where to race for limited money. If you want spectators, class payout, attention, you need a Heads Up show. You name the cars but it cannot be one of everything on a dial in.
The factoring issue is a BIG problem. Too much slowing in class kills it too. Have a Limited number of classes for the money. People will complain. Some cannot continue but team car idea would allow guys to pool money and continue if cost is too much. CiC in eliminations of the 10 or 12 class winners. TOO many classes, variants to satisfy one or two racers. Racing is not Bracket format. Racing is Heads up winning. Want a cheaper Class Car? own 1/4 of it and work together. Want to own it? Create a Modified type class for ONE combination for everyone with strict limits. Not 10 wt breaks..... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,730 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]()
Dick, you just keep beating that drum!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Billy, Same answer is always the correct one....people cannot hide from all the facts forever. Selfish wish to be on stage whatever it costs the S or SS eliminators keep people hanging on to their one of a kind. Not being allowed to run SS or S because someone likes a capri, a pick up, a FWD, a 4000 lb wagon is not an Unconstitutional issue. Recreating an eliminator to re earn excitement, support, sponsors could be a good thing.
Thanks for recognising I got rythm. How about No Break out CIC. Last edited by Dick Butler; 06-19-2013 at 05:07 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Stock is not in trouble, the problem is there a a few who do not like the way NHRA runs the eliminator.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,730 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
BTW Dick, 106? Stockers at Lebanon Valley LODRS and a decent number of them M/S and down. ALL of Stock is doing just fine. I don't feel that I have a "Constitutional Right" to run Stock Eliminator, I believe that it is my decision. At the same time I don't feel that it is a "selfish wish" of mine to be "on the stage" with a "one of a kind Capri, pick-up, FWD, 4,000lb. wagon" either. Just for curiositys sake, would you please refresh my memory as to just what kind of combo you are currently racing? I'm at least, in my crude, humble, cheap way doing my part to support my sport! I'm sorry that I don't measure up to your standards!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: white plains,md
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I sure hope the end of stock is not here...my wife and i have always liked this class...we are in our late 60ths and retired..we tried class racing 40 plus years ago..couldn't do it because of family and jobs...went bracket racing..we ran ihra crate motor class the last 3years...wanted nhra...so we just purchased gary norman's camaro and will be Seeing you all soon
Bill and barbara bricker ( 2 retires living their dream ) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 1,448
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I have a better idea.. Explain to the 3 spectators in the stands what dial-in racing is, why the numbers are on the board, and why the racer got to the finish line first and lost. Have alan reinhart and dave reiff explain it with a computer generated visual aid on espn2, illustrating a few different scenarios that can happen in a dialed race. Explain that this concept is what keeps class racing "fair" for all the competitors until a heads-up run occurs. How about an information board or a pamphlet at national events that explains this as well? I think eliminations are way more interesting to watch than qualifying.. First guy to the finish line wins in those and it's boring. If you don't explain what dial-in racing is you just keep having "ignorant" spectators through no fault of their own who continue to utter things like "That's stupid it should just be first guy to the finish line wins." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 902 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
No one watches shoe polish racing no matter how hard its pushed. If you get to finish line first and lose it should have a different name. When I started racing we ran off the records and it was way more fun. The cars back then typically weren't built like they are now. There was a bigger chance of breakage so there was always the chance you could beat a faster car. Missed shifts were common.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|