HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-18-2013, 01:16 AM   #1
Greenlight
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 16
Liked 79 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Racer Suspension

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy pizzolato View Post
evan you missed my point. my point is that if a 20 year stock seat belt half the width half the thickness will hold up a car. a two year old race belt can't be bad in two years.the two year rule on seat belts should be every five years at the least.there is no way that a racing belt should go bad in two years.my good friend owns a wire rope co he has a tester.we tested a ten year old racing belt and the metal hardware broke and the belt never broke. and jeff teuton had him test it.
Sammy, the OEM seat belts (~1.8" -2.0" wide) have a minimum break requirement of 6000 lbs. and must retain at least 60% of that strength (3600 lbs.) after long term exposure to radiation (i.e. 20 years), etc. (see FMVSS # 209). For a 220 lb. driver (95% percentile), the 20 year old seat belt can withstand about 17g (maybe a 60 mph crash in a modern car).

The attachments (metal portions) each must withstand at least 2500 lbs. (during a crash the seat belt takes the entire load, while the load is distributed to several hardware points.
Generally speaking, the hardware maintains its strength for more than 20 years. That's why you could pick up the 20 year old car by the seat belt.

Racing seat belts are wider and the racer is exposed to more seat belt area (3" wide, 5 pt.), which is very good in distributing the load to the driver during an impact (maybe a 60g impact). The problem, as I see it, is the SFI spec. indicates that the common material used in "racing" seat belts (Dupont Nylon 6-6) maintains only 60% of its strength after 1 years exposure to radiation, and may only retain 10% of their strength after only 2 years of exposure to the elements. This is what I find unbelievable.

http://www.sfifoundation.com/seatbelt.html

If the SFI spec. required manufacturers to use OEM type material (probably slightly more expensive) the seat belt recertification time could be extended, but the manufacturers would make less $$$ (you always have to follow the $$ trail).

Of course, none of us throw our seat belts out in the sun between races (unless we find out that David Rampy is doing it to gain a competitive advantage, then you would see Sun-dried seat belts for sale for $1000s on Racing Junk), so the 3" wide webbing will likely be stronger than the metal components even after 10 years. Hence the hardware breaking in your 10 year old seat belt test.

As I recall, the webbing failed (or the sewing) in Lee Shephard's crash in 1985, which prompted the seat belt rules being what they are today.
Greenlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 09:21 AM   #2
Randall Klein
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 785
Likes: 45
Liked 316 Times in 67 Posts
Default Re: Racer Suspension

Good info Greenlight, appreciated.....do we know if Sheperds belts/stitching failed or early rumors that they were not in use.....regardless this seatbelt "fee" came shortly after that incident....and we are still paying
Randall Klein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 10:08 AM   #3
Bill Koski
Member
 
Bill Koski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Racer Suspension

What is interesting then is that NASCAR has a five year limit on these same belts?
It would seem their belts are liable to be stressed to far more G's then drag racers belts!
The rumors at the time were that LS didn't have his helmet or belts on? He'd been doing only 60 footers so that seems likely.
Bill Koski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 11:22 AM   #4
sammy pizzolato
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: houma louisiana
Posts: 432
Likes: 52
Liked 56 Times in 13 Posts
Send a message via AIM to sammy pizzolato
Default Re: Racer Suspension

thanks green light that is some great info.but i still think the belts should be changed every five years cuz our belts don't have the sunlight exp that a street car has. but someone is making a lot of $$$$$$ off of this and a waste of $$$$$ for the racers.just saying!!! but in the end bob and bugs got the raw end of this deal. and a very good friend that used to work for i am not going to say. said that L.S. did not have them on.
sammy pizzolato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 12:22 PM   #5
Evan Smith
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa
Posts: 400
Likes: 7
Liked 115 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Racer Suspension

Sammy, I totally agree that belts should be certified for 5 years. I hate buying belts every two years!

Evan
__________________
Evan Smith 1798 STK
Evan Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 12:25 PM   #6
Greenlight
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 16
Liked 79 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Racer Suspension

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Koski View Post
The rumors at the time were that LS didn't have his helmet or belts on? He'd been doing only 60 footers so that seems likely.
Here is what LS's widow wrote regarding his accident:

Hey, y'all. Reading all the comments about Lee's death makes me realize that rumors, reliable sources or not, are just not always true. He was doing 60-foot clockings that day, but he was world champ and had previously been in an end-over-end crash in Englishtown, NY, so he would have much more concern about safety than most others. He had his seatbelts on, and tight, and his helmet was on as was his fire jacket. Stories abounded about all those not being done, but they were. Alston installed the seatbelts which were made from sub-standard materials and broke under the force of the crash. His helmet was badly cracked on his way out of the car and there were fibers from his Simpson jacket embedded in the paint on the roll bar, he hit so hard. There was nothing he could do to get the car back under control on his way down the track with the crosswind, so he pulled the chute and the car turned instantly to the right and began to flip end over end, ejecting him early in the crash. He was killed instantly, leaving a huge hole in not only the racing world, but also in the world of those who loved and cherished him in his personal life! I know all this because I am his widow and wanted to let anyone who is interested know the truth. Thank you all for the kind words....
Greenlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 01:26 PM   #7
71mavlouisville
Junior Member
 
71mavlouisville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: Racer Suspension $5000 - are you crazy

$5000.00 is ridiculous!!! I can understand the suspension, taking points or something like that, but, $5000.00? I think $500.00 would be reasonable for a sportsman racer. Has NHRA looked at the payouts for Super Stock, $300 + for entry to win $1800.00
__________________
Ashton Hudson SS/CS 4373
71mavlouisville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 01:37 PM   #8
71mavlouisville
Junior Member
 
71mavlouisville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: Racer Suspension - Sammy's Right

Sammy, I agree with you, seat belts every 2 years is CRAZY! Sometimes I think we get the cart before the horse. The best way to not get hurt is to not crash. A guy can put 1000’s runs on tires, 1000’s runs on engine, 1000’s on rear ends and driveshaft’s, 1000’s run on brakes? But his belts are new? With my chaotic life and being a professional 1st round runner up I get about 30 runs out of a set of seat belts LOL!
__________________
Ashton Hudson SS/CS 4373
71mavlouisville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 12:36 PM   #9
Bob
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Racer Suspension $5000 - are you crazy

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71mavlouisville View Post
$5000.00 is ridiculous!!! I can understand the suspension, taking points or something like that, but, $5000.00? I think $500.00 would be reasonable for a sportsman racer. Has NHRA looked at the payouts for Super Stock, $300 + for entry to win $1800.00
Really?? You think people race for the winners purse??
Walk through the pits and look at some S/SS cars!
30K Engines
6K Automatics
5K Cylinder Heads
100K-200K Cars
500K Haulers-Rigs
Not to mention race weekend expenses like race fuel, travel fuel, tires, and food!

IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD THE MONEY FOR NEW SEAT BELTS, BUT YOU SPEND $100 ON A BEER FOR THE WEEKEND, YOUR PRIORITIES ARE REALLY MESSED UP. BUT EVEN WORSE, IT'S YOUR SAFETY!!

S/SS is an ego sport, plain and simple!!

I agree, Bob is a nice guy. But those that know him also know he skirted the system all the time. NHRA found a chance to get even. Plain and simple!
Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 12:38 PM   #10
1320racer
VIP Member
 
1320racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
Default Re: Racer Suspension

dead on with a zero!
1320racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.