HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2011, 05:24 PM   #21
Jody Lang
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 306
Likes: 28
Liked 89 Times in 28 Posts
Default Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bret Kepner View Post
I guess everybody already forgot Skillman's 9.40 yesterday was at 146.89 mph.
Bret, I didn't see that run.

His run today was faster than a majority of the Super Stock cars at the same race. Seems crazy for a Stocker to be this fast.
Jody Lang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 07:29 PM   #22
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andys dad View Post
Personally - I am glad the V10 did not go that fast

I think it can but Andy and I do not know first hand - YET

We will be in "protect" mode - as it is referred to on here - when we debut at the Las Vegas National - I call that smart class racing

I want to extend a big thanks to Jeff Teuton and the gang for stepping up and slowng down that beast.

Looks like the weight and throttle adjustment worked

LOL

:-) peace
The prototype V-10 Challenger went 9.50's in AA/SA legal trim in testing so I have to believe 9.20's should not be an issue!
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 07:36 PM   #23
Sean Cour
Member
 
Sean Cour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 458
Likes: 170
Liked 124 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Williams View Post
Just imagine what would happen if that car locked up the brakes in the lights, turned hard and struck a lower class car that is not required to have much safety equipment. 145 MPH car hitting an 85 MPH car in the door. Food for thought. Time to move these rocket ships into Super Stock, if for no other reason than safety. When I said that these cars could run in the 8's fairly easily, most everybody looked at me with the stink eye. How much are they opening the throttle to achieve 9.30's? 65%?
Really?!
__________________
Sean Cour
T6066 ladle
Sean Cour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 07:38 PM   #24
K Stubbs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Benton, Arkansas
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

Anthonys car is way faster than most people think......It a BAD AZZ car.
K Stubbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 07:57 PM   #25
Arnold Greene
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

I hate to admit it, but I was wrong. These cars will run in the eights even with weight they earn along the way. Ford is just teasing these guys with the computer programs. I hope the race to the eights is quicker than the race to the nines. Come on guys.......turn those things loose. I want to see a heads up between a CJ and a Mopar with the V10. Who has the biggest one???????

Below is my post from just over two years ago.


Arnold Greene
Junior Member


Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 88 Re: 2008 Cobra Jets belong in Stock

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I can assure you all that my 427/425 with 401 heads made 596 peak horsepower on a DTS dyno. I ran it as light as I could because IHRA's AA/S class is a 7# class. At a test session in Darlington, SC, December 10, 2007, @ 3230 pounds (200# light for NHRA AA/S) I ran 9.520 @ 138.30. 60'(1.279) 330(3.820) 660(5.998@113.61) no 1000' time....9.520@138.30. The air density was 420'. It was full of oil, so it MIGHT have gone high forties. My point is the CJ's have already gone 143(was told it was the car John won the Winters with. CONGRATS to John and his crew!) YOU WILL SEE THESE CARS IN THE 9.20 RANGE WHEN ALL IS SAID AND DONE.

As I said in a previous post, NHRA had factory advertised hp to rate cars, which they did not have with the CJ's. They had to take someone's word for 425. Whoever accepted that number needs their head examined. If anyone with a conventional stocker thinks they can compete with this package, I suggest you save your time and money....just my opinion.
__________________
Arnold Greene
IHRA/NHRA 2420 A/S, B/S
__________________
Arnold Greene
IHRA/NHRA 2420 A/S, B/S
Arnold Greene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 08:15 PM   #26
Andys dad
VIP Member
 
Andys dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arcadia, Ca
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 48
Liked 175 Times in 78 Posts
Default Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

Hey Sean let's give them what they want in Q1 or Q2 at the Vegas National

You and Andy heads up - all out - to a 1000ft

LOL

:-) peace
__________________
time is our most precious resource, you can always make more money but you can never make more time
spend your time wisely with the ones you love - Ron Durham
Andys dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 08:32 PM   #27
Andys dad
VIP Member
 
Andys dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arcadia, Ca
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 48
Liked 175 Times in 78 Posts
Default Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee View Post
The prototype V-10 Challenger went 9.50's in AA/SA legal trim in testing so I have to believe 9.20's should not be an issue!
Jeff Lee

I sent you a PM

Thanks

:-) peace
__________________
time is our most precious resource, you can always make more money but you can never make more time
spend your time wisely with the ones you love - Ron Durham
Andys dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 08:57 PM   #28
west coast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rainy Washington
Posts: 609
Likes: 12
Liked 223 Times in 73 Posts
Default Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

How about we see both cars all the way to the 1/4 mile.
west coast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 09:05 PM   #29
SSGN
Senior Member
 
SSGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 646
Likes: 132
Liked 140 Times in 51 Posts
Angry Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

Hmmm when Bobby D was the first stocker in the 9s I never thought i would see the first in the 8s but appears poss.
Kevin

Last edited by SSGN; 03-13-2011 at 10:01 AM. Reason: ok
SSGN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 09:18 PM   #30
davidhuff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 928
Likes: 1
Liked 120 Times in 42 Posts
Default Re: 9.339 @ 143.03 !!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSGN View Post
Hmmm when Bobby D was the first stocker in the 9s I never thought i would see the first in the 8s but appears poss.Too bad it is not a real stocker but a pupose built race car


Kevin
WOW,ever nhra race I go to all the stockers are purpose built race cars.LOL
davidhuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.