|
![]() |
#21 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I don't know if we can get an 800 car field at a Division 2 race or not. But I also don't believe that you need 800 cars to generate a profit. Although I do fully understand the drain on profits that Slop Alcohol causes. Without counting Slop Alcohol, we now have about 8 classes, so we probably could generate a 600 car field. With one car/driver + 1 crew being the average, a 600 car field generates around $120K in entry fees alone. That's if you never sell a hot dog, hamburger, coke, bag of ice, or spectator ticket. That's also figuring you don't have any "gambler's races" or anything of that sort.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Live Reporter
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
|
![]()
Jack,
My problem with alcohol cars is that we have 4-6 car fields, maybe 8 car fields, at most of the races, and half the time a lot of them can't get down the track without making a mess of things. The track owners have to pay 1/2 a field a full purse, schedule the race around them, and they don't pay an entry fee or bring spectators. The stands are just as empty, if not more, when the alcohol cars run. They aren't all bad, don't get me wrong. I just think they should pay an entry fee like the rest of us, and maybe they need to have some sort of oil down/clean up penalties as well. Yes, if you look at one of my earlier posts, I referred to Bowling Green having a pro show at the division race and getting done in two days. I think it was 1980 we had about 8 cars in each of the pro classes at Bowling Green, if I remember correctly, the Pro Stock final came down to Dyno Don Nicholson in the Kendig/TransGo Mustang II losing to Joe Satmary in the Satmary and Cannon "Tuff Rabbit" Camaro. Those were the days. But they're long gone. Weather permitting, we could probably have a "gambler's race" on Friday and Saturday night, and maybe even a Top Stock show (depends, it won't happen with the factory cars there). It's a struggle for the track owners to even begin to turn a profit. But if they'd got the car counts up by scheduling more races and doing a better job, if nothing else we could help them cut their losses some. I'd like to see the track owners get a better deal as well as the racers.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The points race at Norwalk this year was the first time they've ever had to turn people away at the gate - no more room for spectators. On Saturday, the place had more spectators than I've seen at their national events. They did it with a marketing partnership with Summit, booked in a few jets, and advertised the heck out of it. For every $1 pound of ice cream they sold (at a slight loss), they also sold many more hot dogs, burgers, sodas and beers at high profit margins. I know some would like to see "the leakers" go away completely at the divisional events. Especially some track owners. That is understandable because they haven't figured out a way to cover the purse. Many folks complain about how some events have become more of a "circus" than a race. A little bit of "circus", when properly promoted, will draw spectators. Can that be an inconvenience for the rest of the classes? Sure it can, but it can also help keep a track solvent. In today's economic climate, I think that is of utmost importance. I love this sport at every level. I certainly don't have all of the answers concerning how to keep it going, or to grow it, but I have been to enough events at every level to have seen what works and what doesn't work. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The big loss for Div 2 was Rockingham Winston Invitional .They had huge car counts in everything packed the stands big time.IHRA's crowds have been slim...I guess Steve Earwood wanted a National Event dont remember the whole story I did talk to him about it.He didnt see any piont in upgrading anything if he didnt have some gauranteed big coin.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: n.c.
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
I took the advice and time to e mail MR Schaefer,here is the e mail and a Very timely reply
On Nov 15, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Sherlon Truelove wrote: Mr Schaefer, Seems to be a lot of complaining about the 2011 Divisional Schedule,so i will make my voice heard here with you. First of all I race supergas,next I work for a company thats very supportive of Nhra. That company being GOODYEAR TIRE. I been there going on 33 years,and theres no way one can run that schedule,and keep a full time job. I know you walked into this mess,but WE racers were hoping for some better results. Living in Nc and two hrs from charlottle and i have to travel a min. of 450 miles to run a divisional. I just dont understand the all fl. ga. schedule. Supergas 2122 Sherlon Truelove |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: n.c.
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Mr Schaefer 's reply I understand. And I am not a fan of the current LOS schedule at all but in all fairness it is a little overly optimistic for the racers to anticipate that I could have fixed that problem on such short notice. As you stated, I did inherit this schedule. These dates were essentially already allocated to the tracks when I was brought on board. And I don't have many (if any) options to take dates to different tracks. This is not the schedule that I would like to see.
At the same time, I'm taking over a division that only has 1 track in North Carolina. That track at this time is not looking at a Divisional race. From what I've discovered in the short amount of time I've had in the division, there are a LOT of non-NHRA tracks in the Southeast that are just not willing to run under NHRA's safety and tech guidelines. I would love to have more tracks and more options for Divisional races but only if the tracks operate under the safety requirements of the rulebook. I want more tracks in the Carolinas and Tennessee so that you the racers have more options to run at safely run facilities. I want to more tracks to work with to get the Divisional schedule back in shape. I know it's a mess. But with the hand I was dealt when I came on board, I really don't have many options available yet. I assure you that in time these issues will be addressed and corrected. Trust me, I get it. I know it's a problem. And I'm working on ways to fix it. Stick with us. Rich Schaefer NHRA Southeast Division 4424 NW 13th Street, Suite C6 Gainesville, FL 32609 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|