HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2010, 11:12 AM   #1
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Talking Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

And to think you NHRA racers used to complain about the IHRA "Crate Motored" cars..........LOL. At least they ALWAYS ran from the very begining in their own class and off their own index's and they havent invaded Super Stock. .

Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 10-06-2010 at 11:14 AM.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2010, 05:57 PM   #2
Robert Swartz
Senior Member
 
Robert Swartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN View Post
And to think you NHRA racers used to complain about the IHRA "Crate Motored" cars..........LOL. At least they ALWAYS ran from the very begining in their own class and off their own index's and they havent invaded Super Stock. .
Yep, since NHRA won't adopt this class. I'll probably never again race at Indianapolis. Which is only 30 miles or so north of my home. Sure bet I'll never grace the field at the points meet or the US Nationals again.

Robert Swartz
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro
95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock
Robert Swartz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2010, 07:25 PM   #3
RPinoski1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PLACERVILLE, CA
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Hey Tommy Boy!

You didn't mention that Jimmy D has a mustang.
RPinoski1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 04:16 PM   #4
paul
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

So i guess someone should have told John Armstrong not to bother showing up for class at the US Nationals with his 1969 SS/AA corvette since he could only qualify third in that class behind two of the new cars. Oops wait a minute he did win class!!! I guess thats why we race on the track and not on paper!!

Mike Fahie
paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 04:48 PM   #5
Dgal
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul View Post
So i guess someone should have told John Armstrong not to bother showing up for class at the US Nationals with his 1969 SS/AA corvette since he could only qualify third in that class behind two of the new cars. Oops wait a minute he did win class!!! I guess thats why we race on the track and not on paper!!

Mike Fahie
You are absolutely correct! But there is more to the story and paper didn't apply in your example. Downing looked like he broke according to DRC and Hopkins went red by .005 against Armstrong. By the way Hopkins ran a 8.601 @ 155.97 to Armstrong's 8.836 @ 150.25.

Don
Dgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2010, 10:40 AM   #6
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,647
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,752 Times in 2,235 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Does any one think any B/SA car with a carb or carbs, or LT1, LS1 can run 135 mph or a 9.80 ET.

I bet Dottie "THINKS" she can.

"It's been so wrong for too long" Unknown
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2010, 11:03 AM   #7
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hill View Post
Does any one think any B/SA car with a carb or carbs, or LT1, LS1 can run 135 mph or a 9.80 ET.

I bet Dottie "THINKS" she can.

"It's been so wrong for too long" Unknown

Remember when a B car that ran ten-teens was a bad ride?
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2010, 10:59 AM   #8
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul View Post
So i guess someone should have told John Armstrong not to bother showing up for class at the US Nationals with his 1969 SS/AA corvette since he could only qualify third in that class behind two of the new cars. Oops wait a minute he did win class!!! I guess thats why we race on the track and not on paper!!

Mike Fahie
Yes he won, but it was a complete fluke. Both of the new cars in the class had starting line issues and the crowd went wild when they lost. But, just like you, we all knew the truth and so did John. I spoke to him at Indy.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2010, 01:22 PM   #9
FINESPLINE
Senior Member
 
FINESPLINE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Island of high taxes, N.Y.
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Noland View Post
Yes he won, but it was a complete fluke. Both of the new cars in the class had starting line issues and the crowd went wild when they lost. But, just like you, we all knew the truth and so did John. I spoke to him at Indy.
Even Warren Johnson won in P/S a few races ago. That was a wild turn of events to get to the winners circle. Truth be told --a win is a win-- but I am sure any true competitor (Warren included ) would rather win with both cars at there best. I don"t believe anybody races waiting for that to happen and it most normally won"t.---------John
FINESPLINE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2010, 08:32 PM   #10
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,647
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,752 Times in 2,235 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Tommy where does your carbuerated B/SA "TOP TEN" list compare to the 9.80 @ 135 run of the Drag Pak? I'm not talking of altitude adjusted tracks either!

"Reality in the light of day, nothing like it."
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.