|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 3,380
Liked 1,821 Times in 425 Posts
|
![]()
Hes 90 % right
All I know is when I pulled in the water box and saw the dail in first round in a E/SA Mustang was 10.22.. THATS JUST WRONG !! A a thru C/SA would be proud of that number. By the way ART the 3 cars you speak about all BROKE. So with the 20 new cars NHRA shortened the field by 20+ %
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 133
Liked 531 Times in 108 Posts
|
![]()
I knew they were fast, but not that fast. The Mustang James mentioned was the #1 qualifier at the Mid-Mich. NHRA Div. 3 LODRS, where he ran 10.73. It's obvious he was sandbagging by a 1/2 second at that race. Nothing personal against the driver/owner, but NHRA is letting a flawed system run rampant if they stand by and give this particular car a 10 HP hit. Now, he'll run 10.30's instead of 10.20's in E/SA.
__________________
Jim Kaekel 3836 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]()
Jim they are not going to slow down at all. Most were nowhere near minumum weight.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Another interesting note more than half the cars entered in stock were GM cars
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
173 cars in Stock at Indy
45 did not qualify = 42 "old" cars and 3 "new" cars 150 "old" cars in Stock = 87% 72% of "old" cars qualified 28% of "old" cars did not qualify 23 "new" cars in Stock = 13% 87% of "new" cars qualified 13% of "new" cars did not qualify (broke?) 69% of top 16 qualifiers were "new" cars etc............
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Westfield Mass
Posts: 529
Likes: 368
Liked 425 Times in 56 Posts
|
![]()
DP and CJ are all bogus. Art, don't you run a bogus combo. I look at what people have done with the other cars they have run. Can not make them run, but now they are top qualifiers. Yea right. Most of us have worked hard on our cars and made them run good. We do not relie on NHRA for a soft HP rating. And that is the trruth, like it or not!!!!!!!
__________________
Gary Parker 1617 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
And last but not least the rareest of them all a Dodge Neon. Do you realize the only way you could get one was to buy it. You had to be one of those special people with real money."The inhumanity of it all" LOL LOL
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS Last edited by art leong; 09-13-2010 at 10:12 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|