|
![]() |
#51 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
Because the new package cars that were NEVER even street legal will ruin the established older muscle cars in the same class with their "Flim Flam" HP ratings. The older combos have been beat on for years. These new combos havent even been maxed out yet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I'm sure the new factory race car packages will be under close scrutinization by NHRA at the start of the year. I'm positive that a Ford Mustang or Mopar Challenger will hit the trigger point and probably run fast enough to call for an automatic adjustment. Last year Irv Johns AA/SA Challenger ran 1.16 under (1.15 is the trigger point) and this year with the new index, that would put him 1.13 under the index with the same 9.74 pass. I'm glad Irv didn't run his car in A/SA.
![]() As far as the Gen III Hemi's are concerned. NHRA will first look at the engine family average. I don't know how many 6.1 SRT Magnum's, Charger's or Chrysler 300 C's are running in stock, but I've seen those 4400-4600lb cars run mid 12's to low 13's with just a CAI and a good tune, plus those cars just got factored 5hp for 2010 for having a 370 cubed Hemi. Next NHRA will look at the class/engine average. That means they'll look at the Hemi's with the same specific engine combo, transmission type and body style which will only factor the DP cars and not the rest of the cars in that particular class. I don't know what classes the DP will finally end up at after the shuffle, only time will tell. HP:WT ratio? These DP's aren't as light as some folks figure. In order to make the minimum weight for the class, we figure we only have 320 lbs to work with and the car still needs a cage, full rear end, brakes and suspention, driveshaft, fluids, etc, etc. I'm guessing and this is only a guess as of now, that the finished car should come in between 3400-3450lbs. Given that weight and Drooze gets the 3.25% he's looking for, that'll still put his car at 8.43 at 3400lbs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 178
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
HEMIDUP::
HP:WT ratio? These DP's aren't as light as some folks figure. In order to make the minimum weight for the class, we figure we only have 320 lbs to work with and the car still needs a cage, full rear end, brakes and suspention, driveshaft, fluids, etc, etc. I'm guessing and this is only a guess as of now, that the finished car should come in between 3400-3450lbs. Given that weight and Drooze gets the 3.25% he's looking for, that'll still put his car at 8.43 at 3400lbs. you need to use 3100 as shipping weight on the DragPak with the 6.1 engine which equals 3100lb, 403 HP, equals 7.69 Last edited by Irv Johns; 01-10-2010 at 12:35 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I wouldn't think these new factory race cars should effect the older muscle cars once NHRA establishes the class/engine average based on the specific engine combo, transmission type and body style. Only time will tell though cause that call will still be at the discretion of NHRA. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Barberton Ohio
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
DK
I would be happy to explain it.....but I have some caveats...Im sure youll understand some... I would actually like and enjoy some feedback from people outside our group (i.e. the DP teams its already been shared with) 1)I will submit you a "brief" of the plan via PM, the entire plan is 6 pages of analysis so I dont think you want to muddle through that. 2)You agree not to disclose the details to anyone outside of us (i.e. mums the word) 3)You post back to this thread your general impression although not the details but one of the 3 opinions listed here, a)Hogwash and the raving of a lunatic b)The plan has potential c)Its genius and I should abandon racing and buy an evil genius lair ![]() 4)You share back with me via PM the observations and potential pitfalls you see in the plan as well as point out any incorrect assumptions. Id love to like I said.....Ive had a hard time finding someone whos opinion I would value in an "outside" perspective. Let me know either here or PM and Ill send it over. Cheers Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|