|
![]() |
#71 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
This is a cut & paste from the 2017 NHRA Rulebook: Anytime it has been judged that excessive braking has resulted in loss of control that results in contact with the guardwall and/or light fixtures or crossing the center boundary lines, INCLUDING PAST THE FINISH LINE, the contestant will be disqualified Contact with guardwall, barriers, or any other track fixture (rubber cones, when used, are considered visual aids, not fixtures) is grounds for disqualification and/or other actions. Intentional crossing of boundary lines to leave track or avoid depositing debris on track is not grounds for disqualification ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Did he violate any provision of this rule?????? I watched the video and he doesn't appear to have.... Write a rule and enforce that rule.... and if you notice there is no mention of smoke from the tires being a disqualification.... I don't believe that this rule sums up anything with regard to the Emmons D/Q
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK A & M Motorsports |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fife, Washington
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 2,474
Liked 2,951 Times in 709 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff - Nothing about smoking the tires.
Bob - By summing it up I meant that the rule is pretty plain and should be enforced equally. As far as the Emmons incident, I wasn't there but sounds like he got screwed.
__________________
Ron McDowell - Did Race Every day is a Gift - Enjoy with family and friends. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Maybe this incident will make racers rethink wanting to go race out west.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
The way this rule is written it leaves an open still for interpetation and a out for NHRA in judgement calls. More black and white please.
By this rule Jerry Emmons passed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
Posts: 388
Likes: 21
Liked 286 Times in 73 Posts
|
![]()
I support the current rule as written, and as was previously enforced.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Englewood, Florida
Posts: 989
Likes: 35
Liked 317 Times in 103 Posts
|
![]()
According to the rule you can be sideways in your lane with smoke coming off the fronts as long as you don't hit a fixture or wall or center line, it is deemed permissible. I know that if a driver is just being stupid there is a rule under safety that over rides all rules. But if a person has control it should not be a violation, according to the rule. If a driver was warned to be more cautious, and he /she does so, then there is no violation. It appears that the car in question had control, probably better than what he was warned about previously. If his actions and control at the time of incident is what got him DQ then there probably be at least 30% of the field getting DQ at the next event.
If the starter is the person making the decision for a top end mishap or violation then we have a problem as his view is limited. That is why officials at the finish line should make the call. They probably do, but we have not been informed as such. It is NHRA's decision to clarify the rule a little better than the current one. I'll bet their insurance carrier will have a voice in it. My personal view is that if the fronts have smoke, DQ. Sorry, but I had to look at it from common sense. If you are holding that much, use it wisely. Ron Ortiz U/SA more fun just easing the brake
__________________
Ron Ortiz 2102 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pukwana SD
Posts: 860
Likes: 554
Liked 99 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
Liked 502 Times in 130 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If you are going to brake hard, practice at a track rental day when its safe, and your alone on the track. If you video it, then you can see what the effect is and if you are within the rules, and common sense. The loss of control and the entering into the unforgettable "pre-crash" slowdown of time is best to be avoided, as sometimes you and car get lucky and get away unscathed, sometimes you walk away and your car takes the pain, and sometimes you don't get to walk away. That said, who doesn't like to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat at the stripe. Just use your head! Eric
__________________
Eric Merryfield 1883 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,583 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]()
It looks like Jerry's car's nose is higher while the other car's nose is lower like he was on the brakes..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Liked 276 Times in 54 Posts
|
![]()
Some interesting commentary on this topic from Luke Bogacki in his Sportsman Drag Racing podcast here.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/...t/id1180988317
__________________
Been racing Stock and S/S cars since 1973. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|