|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sponsor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Churchville, NY
Posts: 492
Likes: 128
Liked 1,043 Times in 70 Posts
|
![]()
I received my first ever letter from the tech dept after the World Finals regarding this matter. The quintesential SS/JA car is a '69 Camaro with a 255/350, and they've ALWAYS had cowl hoods. That, however, does not make it right.
I told Bruce I was sure one could "have" a cowl hood with that combo, but I'd research it. Turns out, not so much. The cowl hood (ZL2 option) was AVAILABLE on the Z/28 and SS models, and came included on the COPO and Pace Car. Well, you could not get the LM1 255/350 in any of those, so therefore, you could not pair a 255 with a cowl hood. Period. 300/350, yes, in both an SS and a Pace Car. So, right is right, wrong is wrong, and the facts are the facts... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
What does it give one car over another? D |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
I don't have a dog in this fight, but it seems to me it should be like common law marriage. If you've lived together for more than seven years the law could consider you married. Why would anyone want to try and all of a sudden make these hoods illegal after years of them being legal. With all the BS in stock and super stock this sure seems like a strange issue to want to enforce.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 143
Likes: 90
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
HP ratings
__________________
Sean Gaffney SS/G & SS/H 1223 AA/S & A/S 1008 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: southern maine
Posts: 383
Likes: 162
Liked 64 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]()
Nothing...
__________________
Mark Callanan 1027 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 143
Likes: 90
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
if there is nothing why is one rated at 315 and the other 317? If you want this issue to be about nothing have NHRA make both versions same HP right?
__________________
Sean Gaffney SS/G & SS/H 1223 AA/S & A/S 1008 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
The 315 hp is a 1969 300/315 041 head engine. The hood is not a factor
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: southern maine
Posts: 383
Likes: 162
Liked 64 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If you have proof there is a value post your proof
__________________
Mark Callanan 1027 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 143
Likes: 90
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Marc, that is my point exactly, why different HP ratings because of the hood you are campaigning? All I am saying is that wether you have a flat hood or a cowl hood it shouldn't matter and compromise the HP rating. It should be 315 or 317 just make it the same for all.
__________________
Sean Gaffney SS/G & SS/H 1223 AA/S & A/S 1008 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 50
Likes: 5
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
It has been a while but I could run faster with the cowl hood with stock air cleaner base sealed to hood.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|