HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-25-2010, 08:38 PM   #27
Adger Smith
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
Default Re: Can you settle an argument?

Paul wrote:
On the small-journal versus large-journal.
The 67' blocks were 2-bolt mains, and utilized connecting rods with 5/16" bolts.
Also pistons with pressed-in pins.
The theory is the 4-bolt mains and larger-journal cranks are stronger.

This one can be debated until eternity.
I say:
Yes, Paul it can be debated, but as an engine builder that lived and work through that era of cars/engines I can say with authority it is a theory that is true. One major change that came about with the large journals is the overlap of the main and rod journals increased in the crankshaft. It was so much stronger it reduced flex and you could reduce bearing clearances. The small journal cranks and 2" rods with 11/32, not 5/16, rod bolts you had so much flex in the crank and rod distortion you had to have insane bearing clearances. Since that time period the improvements in metallurgy have also improved the strength of both factory and aftermarket race parts. Wow, no more co-plated rods for floating pins!!! (remember them?)
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS)
Adger Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.