|
![]() |
#1 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 1,919
Liked 10,681 Times in 2,222 Posts
|
![]()
1. Look at the weight of the cars at the scales and use 100 lbs heavy = .1 subtracted from run, 80 lbs .08 subtracted from run.
2. Use 1/8 mile info E.T. and MPH to help stop the sandbaging 3. Two hits of -1.00 under, automatic hp on Monday, the average just does not work. I.e. 396 /375 Last edited by Larry Hill; 04-11-2011 at 08:46 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
2)Wrong.......I'm not a rocket scientist but there is no firm formula for a cars performance at the 1/8th mile. 3)I'm not sure of that. Larry you need better arguments for the inequities in the AHFS.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA Last edited by Ed Fernandez; 04-10-2011 at 09:35 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jackson
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I think this AHFS need to not be computer driven... I think weather conditions/track conditions need to come into affect. Also I think if someone runs quick enough to get Hp # 1) take them apart to make sure their legal & 2) hit just that car.... as in if it's an 80 Corvette that get's it hit don't hit everything with just that piston in it! ( read 73-81 350 dish motors) We all know these new cars are fast.....But I think if we leave them run they will beat each other up soon ....just like the LT1 & LS F body cars. ( they may have put FI & Carb cars back together to soon?)
__________________
Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 700
Likes: 446
Liked 170 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
Use common sense to fix underrated combos
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 478
Likes: 1
Liked 276 Times in 27 Posts
|
![]()
Let's try this idea.
If an engine combination hits the -1.20 or more under the index twice during a season, NHRA shall then have the right to set the refactored horsepower on that engine combination anywhere it deems necessary. Example...the 1st time engine XYZ is rated at 345 and goes -1.22, it gets 12 horsepower making it 357. Two weeks later it goes -1.25 under. It is clear after the 2nd time that the horsepower is still wrong. NHRA calculates that the horsepower needs to be at 400 and refactors it there. This would eliminate any lengthy time span in getting the horsepower corrected. Travis Miller (Disclaimer; Opinions expressed by me on this forum are exactly that, my opinions.) Last edited by Travis Miller; 04-11-2011 at 09:06 AM. Reason: A better explanation for all to see. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PLACERVILLE, CA
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Hi Guys,
I vote for putting all the combos Back to the factory HP ratings...lol Imagine 66-67 327 275/275 etc.... and let the AHFS fix it!
__________________
"I've never seen a Hearse with a Luggage Rack, You Can't Take it With You" Mike Ness |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 808
Likes: 7
Liked 20 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
1) It is completely possiable to have a weather station at each tech trailer that monotors the weather and factors the given weather back to a standard. Example, STP, standard temp, pressure etc. There could be a correction factor at the end of every qualifying round and that is the number to "correct" the times back to the standard. This would take into account all weathers and elevations.
2) Factor new cars and older ones that have been intruduced into the book fairly. Get a rear wheel HP something, if you have nothing to go by. Look at the entire engine specs. 3) All cars that run fast enough to receive a factor shall be tore down. It does not matter if they pass the scales, fail fuel check or what ever they have to be tore down to be determined legal for the factor. Then if they are found to be illegal then they will be penalized... To me it is real simple.. Hire the personell, give them the equipment and go to it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cajun country
Posts: 339
Likes: 51
Liked 34 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
I guess ole Larry thinks the 396 isn't fair because it carries 45 less cubic inches, two less barrels and 15 more Hp than his car. He believes it needs more because a few people out of the many have been fast. News Flash! Not everyone with one is flyin, and the two times it went under a second this year have been at a factored track and in very unusual weather conditions in Houston. It was like 65 degrees with a huge tail wind. Talk about a self serving agenda hidden under the guidlelines of "fixing" the AHFS.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 68
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
Do not publish the triggers so that we can manipulate it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Larry's #1 isn't acrurate. 100lb is not 1/10th on all cars. The more power you make, the less effect it has. Mine, 100 lbs = no more than .08. Higher hp cars is less. Might help, but won't be enough. Probably not .05 with the new Mustangs. Good friend of mine is crew chief on a SBC Comp car, they juggle weight to change classes. He says with their car 100 lbs is five hundredths.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|