|
![]() |
#41 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,826 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
But you're saying that roller lifters and roller cams are necessary for Stock Eliminator.. Maybe you should help Terry fix his problems. ![]() What I wrote is factually correct. Converting to roller cams and lifters will require entirely new lobe designs. Oh, and you can then use even stronger valve springs, turn more RPM, break something else, and cry for another rule change.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 191
Likes: 3
Liked 185 Times in 56 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
John Ancona 717 STK / SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,826 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
You know, that's actually decent advice. You should take it.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
|
![]()
Ignoring pushrod angle against the lifter. A flat lifter / cam really produces no side loading.
Again ignoring pushrod angle against the lifter. A roller lifter / cam will produce side loading. Look at pressure angle. While a roller lifter doesn't the max velocity limit of a flat lifter, at does have other limits. Again look at pressure angle. Stan |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#45 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,826 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yep. And they haven't gotten into the differences in lifter diameter, lifter wheel diameter, or what all of that will do to the rest of the valvetrain, like the rocker arms, rocker studs, rocker stud bosses...... As usual, a lot of people THINK they know. Then they'll be stunned at the can of worms they opened. They fail to understand, they do not want that genie out of the bottle, because it will NEVER go back in.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 705
Likes: 128
Liked 501 Times in 91 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe taking a couple of steps backwards would help Stock more than of going with parts that would cost more money and people with deeper pockets having advantages. Stock as stock, hydraulic lifters back where they belong in the engines that came with them from the factory. Have a valve spring pressure rule to where an engine family can run +30 lbs from design.
With the changes, there wouldn't be a big need of the AHFS, cars would fall back to the performance levels that were expected. If you haven't noticed, but the age of the racers isn't getting any lower. New blood can't afford a Stock prepared car because of rules that don't make sense about a stock car. This is just my opinion, I don't need hate replies. Casey Miles 248H Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 777
Likes: 530
Liked 231 Times in 107 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
My recent lifter problem is due to coating. Coatings seem to not hold up. I really don't understand why not. I'm a retired tool & die maker/maintenance so I've seen and know the extreme pressures steels are under in die stamping/forming and coatings holding up in those operations. AND usually with very little cooling from oil, etc. What I'm trying to understand is how at the pressures of a lifter/valve spring (on a stocker) that the coatings will not hold up. Some of those forming/stamping operations use thousands of pounds of force with absolutely no or very little wear. I'm sure (from emails I've received) that I'm not the only one fighting this problem. It makes since that a smaller lift and lighter weight valve train doesn't seem to have the problem. My problem is complicated by the fact that all flat tappet motors are at a disadvantage because of lifter surface and roller lifters are adjustable by roller wheel, bushed wheels and oils. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
|
![]()
If you look at what I posted. "It is all in there" The "Trace Point" / "Pitch Curve" will change as roller wheel radius increases or decreases.
Stan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 777
Likes: 530
Liked 231 Times in 107 Posts
|
![]()
As stated above. I'm retired. On a fixed income. Would like to spend a few of my retirement years racing. Hell, I ain't sure I can even get into the car anymore, it's been so long.
Keep in mind we're talking about motors that were produced in the 1960's and 70's. There hasn't been a flat tappet motor to come out of Detroit since 1985. So, we're talking at least 40 year old motor design. When was the last set of Shubeck's made? At least 10 years maybe 15. Some people have said. I see you have your car for sale. YES I do. Mainly because it's a pain for an old timer with arthritis to get in and out of. Some have also said it's another nail in the coffin for the stockers. Let me tell ya something. That horse left the barn A LONG TIME AGO. If the rule were changed I doubt it would say you have to run the roller lifter. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,733 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]()
Are you delusional? If you're running a big-block anything in Stock then you're in a highly populated class. If the rule is changed then your competitors WILL take advantage of it meaning you WILL be forced to take advantage of it or you will not be competitive.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|