HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2023, 08:38 PM   #41
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,826 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

Quote:
Originally Posted by john ancona View Post
Maybe you ,and others would have some creditably if you replied with facts rather to what YOU wrote that is flat wrong , maybe you should check your facts as to if I can make a flat tappet run in stock with zero problems ,I have had not one problem in well over a dozen years running my 396 375 hp in stock @ 8200

But you're saying that roller lifters and roller cams are necessary for Stock Eliminator..


Maybe you should help Terry fix his problems.






What I wrote is factually correct.


Converting to roller cams and lifters will require entirely new lobe designs.


Oh, and you can then use even stronger valve springs, turn more RPM, break something else, and cry for another rule change.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2023, 09:15 PM   #42
john ancona
Member
 
john ancona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 191
Likes: 3
Liked 185 Times in 56 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
But you're saying that roller lifters and roller cams are necessary for Stock Eliminator..


Maybe you should help Terry fix his problems.






What I wrote is factually correct.


Converting to roller cams and lifters will require entirely new lobe designs.


Oh, and you can then use even stronger valve springs, turn more RPM, break something else, and cry for another rule change.
Maybe you should keep you Ill-founded opinions to your self ,you appear to lack any knowledge about what you are talking about ,put simply what you wrote is not factually correct ,you maybe better served to keeping your opinions to your self .
__________________
John Ancona 717 STK / SS
john ancona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2023, 09:29 PM   #43
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,826 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

Quote:
Originally Posted by john ancona View Post
Maybe you should keep you Ill-founded opinions to your self ,you appear to lack any knowledge about what you are talking about ,put simply what you wrote is not factually correct ,you maybe better served to keeping your opinions to your self .

You know, that's actually decent advice. You should take it.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2023, 09:36 PM   #44
Stan Weiss
Senior Member
 
Stan Weiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

Ignoring pushrod angle against the lifter. A flat lifter / cam really produces no side loading.


Again ignoring pushrod angle against the lifter. A roller lifter / cam will produce side loading. Look at pressure angle.


While a roller lifter doesn't the max velocity limit of a flat lifter, at does have other limits. Again look at pressure angle.



Stan
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ab-pressure-angle-chb1.gif
Views:	894
Size:	46.0 KB
ID:	68844   Click image for larger version

Name:	ab-pressure-angle-chb2.gif
Views:	898
Size:	16.9 KB
ID:	68845  
Stan Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2023, 09:45 PM   #45
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,826 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Weiss View Post
Ignoring pushrod angle against the lifter. A flat lifter / cam really produces no side loading.


Again ignoring pushrod angle against the lifter. A roller lifter / cam will produce side loading. Look at pressure angle.


While a roller lifter doesn't the max velocity limit of a flat lifter, at does have other limits. Again look at pressure angle.



Stan

Yep.


And they haven't gotten into the differences in lifter diameter, lifter wheel diameter, or what all of that will do to the rest of the valvetrain, like the rocker arms, rocker studs, rocker stud bosses......




As usual, a lot of people THINK they know. Then they'll be stunned at the can of worms they opened. They fail to understand, they do not want that genie out of the bottle, because it will NEVER go back in.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 10-08-2023, 11:35 PM   #46
Casey Miles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 705
Likes: 128
Liked 501 Times in 91 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

Maybe taking a couple of steps backwards would help Stock more than of going with parts that would cost more money and people with deeper pockets having advantages. Stock as stock, hydraulic lifters back where they belong in the engines that came with them from the factory. Have a valve spring pressure rule to where an engine family can run +30 lbs from design.
With the changes, there wouldn't be a big need of the AHFS, cars would fall back to the performance levels that were expected.
If you haven't noticed, but the age of the racers isn't getting any lower. New blood can't afford a Stock prepared car because of rules that don't make sense about a stock car.
This is just my opinion, I don't need hate replies.

Casey Miles
248H Stock
Casey Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2023, 04:57 AM   #47
Terry Cain
Senior Member
 
Terry Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 777
Likes: 530
Liked 231 Times in 107 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Miles View Post
Maybe taking a couple of steps backwards would help Stock more than of going with parts that would cost more money and people with deeper pockets having advantages.

Casey Miles
248H Stock
When's the last time a lifter wheel diameter was checked. Has it EVER. Advantage?

My recent lifter problem is due to coating. Coatings seem to not hold up. I really don't understand why not. I'm a retired tool & die maker/maintenance so I've seen and know the extreme pressures steels are under in die stamping/forming and coatings holding up in those operations. AND usually with very little cooling from oil, etc. What I'm trying to understand is how at the pressures of a lifter/valve spring (on a stocker) that the coatings will not hold up. Some of those forming/stamping operations use thousands of pounds of force with absolutely no or very little wear.
I'm sure (from emails I've received) that I'm not the only one fighting this problem. It makes since that a smaller lift and lighter weight valve train doesn't seem to have the problem. My problem is complicated by the fact that all flat tappet motors are at a disadvantage because of lifter surface and roller lifters are adjustable by roller wheel, bushed wheels and oils.
__________________
Terry Cain ???? STK
tcain19689585@gmail.com
Terry Cain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2023, 06:46 AM   #48
Stan Weiss
Senior Member
 
Stan Weiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Liked 734 Times in 385 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

If you look at what I posted. "It is all in there" The "Trace Point" / "Pitch Curve" will change as roller wheel radius increases or decreases.


Stan
Stan Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2023, 08:36 AM   #49
Terry Cain
Senior Member
 
Terry Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 777
Likes: 530
Liked 231 Times in 107 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

As stated above. I'm retired. On a fixed income. Would like to spend a few of my retirement years racing. Hell, I ain't sure I can even get into the car anymore, it's been so long.
Keep in mind we're talking about motors that were produced in the 1960's and 70's. There hasn't been a flat tappet motor to come out of Detroit since 1985. So, we're talking at least 40 year old motor design. When was the last set of Shubeck's made? At least 10 years maybe 15.
Some people have said. I see you have your car for sale. YES I do. Mainly because it's a pain for an old timer with arthritis to get in and out of. Some have also said it's another nail in the coffin for the stockers. Let me tell ya something. That horse left the barn A LONG TIME AGO. If the rule were changed I doubt it would say you have to run the roller lifter.
__________________
Terry Cain ???? STK
tcain19689585@gmail.com
Terry Cain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2023, 08:58 AM   #50
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,733 Times in 1,739 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry Cain View Post
If the rule were changed I doubt it would say you have to run the roller lifter.
Are you delusional? If you're running a big-block anything in Stock then you're in a highly populated class. If the rule is changed then your competitors WILL take advantage of it meaning you WILL be forced to take advantage of it or you will not be competitive.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.