HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2023, 01:05 PM   #1
Coleydog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 569
Likes: 36
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
Default Re: 2 step question

I’d still like to know the advantage of using the 2 step in stock? I used it with and without a trans brake with a delay box in bracket racing
Coleydog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2023, 01:35 PM   #2
MR DERBY CITY
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 1,083
Liked 7,919 Times in 1,515 Posts
Default Re: 2 step question

There is absolutely no advantage in using a two step in stock eliminator. If there was the whiny azz chicken chits would have it outlawed and rulebooked out of existence. YOU whiny azz chicken chits KNOW who you are. They operate by the principal of ….If I don’t use it ,it shouldn’t be LEGAL ….
MR DERBY CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2023, 01:38 PM   #3
Rob Petrie E395
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodlawn IL
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 162
Liked 216 Times in 77 Posts
Default Re: 2 step question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleydog View Post
I’d still like to know the advantage of using the 2 step in stock? I used it with and without a trans brake with a delay box in bracket racing
Consistency in starting line RPM. I can also use it to adjust my reaction times. If I’m really amped up and can’t get out to let air out of the front tires. I can click the 2 step RPM down one or two clicks and it’ll slow my reaction times down. It’s also easier and more consistent (for me). To hold the accelerator to the floor. And just let go of the brake pedal. Vs swapping feet. I’ve been told it’s easier on the convertor but harder on valve train. So take your pick there I guess.



Older racer. Thank you. I thought there was a rule against having it adjustable from the drivers seat. But couldn’t find it. Thought the rule might have gotten changed when I couldn’t find it in the rule book.

Last edited by Rob Petrie E395; 04-09-2023 at 01:44 PM.
Rob Petrie E395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2023, 07:09 AM   #4
Andy Friar
Member
 
Andy Friar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Howell, MI
Posts: 250
Likes: 699
Liked 226 Times in 76 Posts
Default Re: 2 step question

[QUOTE=Rob Petrie E395;678659]Consistency in starting line RPM. I can also use it to adjust my reaction times. If I’m really amped up and can’t get out to let air out of the front tires. I can click the 2 step RPM down one or two clicks and it’ll slow my reaction times down. It’s also easier and more consistent (for me). To hold the accelerator to the floor. And just let go of the brake pedal. Vs swapping feet. I’ve been told it’s easier on the convertor but harder on valve train. So take your pick there I guess.

My Dad wants to make changes like this after 'missing' a RT. I do everything I can do to not make changes to the car for RT as I don't feel I as a human I am consistent enough to say that dropping a few PSI out of the tires or changing launch rpm is the solution. Practice and routine is always preached by the hitters that win a lot of racers. Box or No Box racers. To me changing mechanical components along with human variability just adds another variable to the equation. If it does 'work' on a few runs to get a better RT, can I then actually say it was the mechanical change or me just doing a better job? I don't feel I can make that call. Could just be my misguided theory too, as I have won nothing...
__________________
Andy Friar
Andy Friar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2023, 02:09 PM   #5
Lenny5160_v2
Member
 
Lenny5160_v2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
Posts: 173
Likes: 462
Liked 218 Times in 94 Posts
Default Re: 2 step question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Friar View Post
I do everything I can do to not make changes to the car for RT as I don't feel I as a human I am consistent enough to say that dropping a few PSI out of the tires or changing launch rpm is the solution.
Sometimes the psychological impact of a change can be just as (or more) important as the actual mechanical change.
__________________
Tony Leonard
S/ST 56
S/C 53
Lenny5160_v2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2023, 01:38 PM   #6
J.R. Haddad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 784
Likes: 935
Liked 1,464 Times in 307 Posts
Default Re: 2 step question

Consistent leaves at start line without having to look at tach, thus taking away concentration at a very important time. Some cars are quicker ET wise with a two-step than off the brake. Make reaction time a little more adjustable. Those are some reasons. There are many more.

J.R.
J.R. Haddad is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 04-09-2023, 02:04 PM   #7
darrellbargeron
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 22
Likes: 2
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2 step question

On stockers:

What rpm do you guys typically set your starting line rpm on your 2 step?
darrellbargeron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2023, 10:02 PM   #8
Dave Gantz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Verrry South Jersey
Posts: 537
Likes: 134
Liked 251 Times in 125 Posts
Default Re: 2 step question

With a carb anyway, the car may leave differently with the throttle wide open, and rpm controlled by the two-step versus leaving with the throttle open just enough to hold a given rpm, or even from an idle.
Tuning may affect these possibilities, I've never tested the two methods.
Dave Gantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2023, 06:57 PM   #9
Coleydog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 569
Likes: 36
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
Default Re: 2 step question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Gantz View Post
With a carb anyway, the car may leave differently with the throttle wide open, and rpm controlled by the two-step versus leaving with the throttle open just enough to hold a given rpm, or even from an idle.
Tuning may affect these possibilities, I've never tested the two methods.
With my 64 I would hold the rpm at 2100, = .01 2000. = .02-3, 2300 real close to big red. With two step and trans brake @ 3500 with pedal on floor delay box determined rt. I also tried the air cylinder on throttle lever with pedal on floor, idle it at 2000 just up to edge of converter (069 J) with four wheel line lock. I liked this system because of no stuttering. Let the button go and the cylinder pulls throttle to wide open (took awhile to get that set) with delay in the box. Popped button on top bulb. With those two systems it was .00s all night and still got sent to trailer quite often. One guy could bump the button down if he felt he was late off the top bulb, track champion quite a few times, dumb as a rock, could barely change his oil, his dad set it all up he just drove the car.
Coleydog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2024, 04:04 PM   #10
greatinspirational
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 74
Likes: 6
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: 2 step question

Are 3 steps legal in stock ? I don't have a rulebook in front of me. I currently have a 2 that controls burnout and a high RPM but would love to add a third for lauch
greatinspirational is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.