|
|
01-31-2018, 01:45 PM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jackson,Ms.
Posts: 34
|
97 mustang 3.8
Just a crazy little thought. Has anyone ever looked at a 3.8 combo in 1997 mustang automatic? I believe it will Q/auto at around 3060 with driver. Just looking for thought and something else do do with cold and rain in forcast. Thanks
|
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 04:39 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Sponsor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mayer , a fur piece up the road...
Posts: 4,771
|
Re: 97 mustang 3.8
Quote:
I don't know what trans fits it. It's P-Q-R or T with a convertible.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 08:22 AM
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jackson,Ms.
Posts: 34
|
Re: 97 mustang 3.8
Hey Mark, The car is a coupe stick right now, but was looking a C4 possibly. This would be a new project for me, but wanted something different for daughter and grand-daughters. Also, not trying to break the bank, 70 yrs. old and probably my last hoorah. You have been around also, what would you suggest for rear gear and tire size? 2.75 first gear unless I can find a 2.92. Thanks for the reply and suggestions Mark. Larry
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 09:25 AM
|
#4 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 2,103
|
Re: 97 mustang 3.8
At 170 HP, it compares well with the 3.8 Firebirds that are at 185 and 206. A little less compression and smaller TB. It should be a fun ride.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK |
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 10:19 AM
|
#5 | |
|
Sponsor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mayer , a fur piece up the road...
Posts: 4,771
|
Re: 97 mustang 3.8
Quote:
Off hand, I'd say 6500 shift and 7000 in the lights. I'd guess that the manifold and t.b. is designed to make torque to 6 grand anyway. Once you figure the finish line rpm, then figure what the mph would be at a second under, then figure what gear and tire size it takes to get it there. PS, I like the stick idea.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 01:06 PM
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jackson,Ms.
Posts: 34
|
Re: 97 mustang 3.8
Billy, thanks for the reply, I only have about 2 nickles left to try, and if it doesn't work I'll let her go local track and let everyone play chase. Ha-Ha
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 01:10 PM
|
#7 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jackson,Ms.
Posts: 34
|
Re: 97 mustang 3.8
Mark, the reason for the C4, I have one and a fresh unbroken 8" conv. to redo and just need a 2.92 or 2.75. If I drive some I can probably fit in R/SA. Car has been our street family back-up for years. I have an 8.8 and a 9" rear housing also.
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 01:46 PM
|
#8 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 2,103
|
Re: 97 mustang 3.8
Use the 8.8.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK |
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 05:36 PM
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sedalia, Mo
Posts: 299
|
Re: 97 mustang 3.8
This has been on my list of cars to build for years. Now I am too old to build any more.
I had one of these engines apart and it looked like a race engine inside.
__________________
Bob Shaw V/SA 515 |
|
|
|
|
02-18-2018, 08:35 PM
|
#10 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3
|
Re: 97 mustang 3.8
Just a question on this build idea. What about trying a helical gear diff. such as the Eaton Detroit Tru-Track for the Ford 7.5. This unit is suppose to be good for 300 h.p and ell. the spider gears , the weak link on the 7.5. Also will all C.4s bolt on to the 3.8 or is there a adaptor? Going back to the 7.5. i'm just thinking about saving as much weight as possible, as the car in R/SA would be about 3200 Lbs. Just thinking out loud. Jimmy
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
