|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
![]()
Ron, The 302 has 1.08 venturi @133 original net HP.
The 307 has a 1.09 venturi @168 HP (original , 130) Cam , compression, are similar. That was Billy's point here. It is what it is. My point would be, if the 307's were reduced to 130 tomorrow, there might be 2 or 3 built across the whole country within a couple of years. Many more would just sit back and complain about the soft rating, rather than building one themselves.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,723 Times in 1,738 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
NHRA has always, in my humble opinion, been a "buddy club". We all pay the same dues but we don't all have to follow or play by the same rules. Certain members get certain considerations that the rest of us just aren't privy to. I guess that is just human nature but it's not fair. But then again, life ain't fair. Do you really think that if NHRA dropped the factor on the 307 or the 304 or 318 (or 283,289,273,290,318poly,348,352,361,etc,etc,etc) only 2 or 3 would be built? I personally believe, looking at how many FFFords that have been or are being built, if you gave the un-washed masses a Chevy equivalent to the 302, there would be dozens of them out there. With the popularity of NHRA Stock, Nostalgia and Jr. Stock right now, I don't see how they wouldn't be built. Oh well, you can have the soap box back, I'll go back to complaining about LD340s. It would be nice to see the 307 at 130 HP though, it would probably make me do a 350. And I don't fault those who take advantage of any of the NHRA "f**k-ups.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I was meaning to say was not many would be built for the national stage. How many Tri- 5's do you see being built since they have been brought back? Let's face it. Most guys that can afford the 5-6 points meet / National event entry game, can afford to build a fairly late model, 10 second car that does a big wheelie for the camera. I didn't think about the independent S/SS association races. Yes, you are probably right that several would be built for that venue. But NHRA doesn't get much of a piece of that action, so there's no interest there.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 277
Likes: 205
Liked 92 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by DRAKE VISCOME; 09-03-2017 at 06:54 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: kansas
Posts: 235
Likes: 498
Liked 249 Times in 48 Posts
|
![]()
A class trophy at Indy is an important thing to a lot of people including me.
Just asking for a level playing field. Pete |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 277
Likes: 205
Liked 92 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 232
Likes: 168
Liked 117 Times in 52 Posts
|
![]()
How about the 1986 C-10 and its HP rating history? Why nobody crying about that one?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|