HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Class Racer Builds
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2015, 05:36 PM   #1
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
Default Re: 75 Nova U/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland View Post
????


Billy's 307 uses a 1.437" throttle bore carb like a 283; the 75 262 uses a 1.686" throttle bore carb like a 305/350. The 72 307 is rated at 171; the 75 262 is rated at 165.
I should have said same venturi size, which is smallest restriction, and what most look at for air flow comparision...FFFFFord air horns aside for a moment.

My mistake.I though Billy had a 1970 year model. Never looked at it too closely.
Should have looked it up on www.classracerinfo.com

I stand by whatever's left!
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2015, 05:58 PM   #2
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,723 Times in 1,738 Posts
Default Re: 75 Nova U/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
My mistake.I though Billy had a 1970 year model.
All 307s use the small base 2G. Just like a 283. OBTW, I think that you're right about the 262. It should run much better than a 307.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2015, 06:14 PM   #3
THE LEGEND
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fayetteville, n.c.
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 75 Nova U/SA

Mike at that race I was only about .05 slow in the heat the 8.22 was a bad run. By the end of the night I was running low teens which was about right
THE LEGEND is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2015, 10:47 PM   #4
MikeMoller
Senior Member
 
MikeMoller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 637
Likes: 27
Liked 254 Times in 78 Posts
Default Re: 75 Nova U/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE LEGEND View Post
Mike at that race I was only about .05 slow in the heat the 8.22 was a bad run. By the end of the night I was running low teens which was about right
Chip, you just burst my bubble! LOL
__________________
Mike Moller
NHRA 203 Q-R-T/SA
MikeMoller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2015, 03:07 AM   #5
Bobby Zlatkin
Member
 
Bobby Zlatkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mills River, NC
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 75 Nova U/SA

Wow Mike, I've really enjoyed following your build. I feel it's the spirit of what Jr. Stock is all about. A true do-it-yourself dime rocket.

And you're right about Chip (the Legend) Johnson. Great guy.

Keep chipping (no pun intended) away at it and keep us posted. I see you've got quite a following of true racers that build with their heads, not their wallets.

Good luck.
__________________
Bobby & Norene Zlatkin L/SA
Bobby Zlatkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2015, 06:51 PM   #6
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 779 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: 75 Nova U/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
All 307s use the small base 2G. Just like a 283. OBTW, I think that you're right about the 262. It should run much better than a 307.
SO, the 305 with 43 more cubic inches, a bit better camshaft, and a bigger venturi carb, is it better than the 262 even though it costs 15 hp?
(Not mentioning the nice heads on the 305)
__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2015, 07:09 PM   #7
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,723 Times in 1,738 Posts
Default Re: 75 Nova U/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland View Post
SO, the 305 with 43 more cubic inches, a bit better camshaft, and a bigger venturi carb, is it better than the 262 even though it costs 15 hp?
(Not mentioning the nice heads on the 305)
The 305 and 262 heads are basically the same. AND the 76 262 gets the same carb as the 305! Only problem is the availability in the Monza only. I personally think that the 305 is a better deal but then, I'm the guy that did a 307!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2015, 07:16 PM   #8
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
Default Re: 75 Nova U/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
All 307s use the small base 2G. Just like a 283. OBTW, I think that you're right about the 262. It should run much better than a 307.
Edit :
Gonna start the bidding at -.55...Who'll give -.60? -.55 .55 .55 going once...
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.