|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Ok, Here goes. CLASS: ECONO MOD
81 and older cars. No front wheel drive conversions. 9 lbs. per C.I.D. Min. wt. 3,000 lbs. Max. 1 750 cfm carb. Choke horn must remain. Baseplate standard 750. Ford, Mopar, and GM only. Brodix spec head. Only mods allowed angle milling, and polishing combustion chamber. 11\32 valve min. 2.08 max. Titanium allowed. Cast intake generally available. No external mods. Max 2" spacer. Any piston, any rod, any crank, any ring package, any bore, any stroke. No vac pumps, external oil pumps, belt drives, or internal billet pumps allowed. No computers allowed. No titanium, or carbon fiber driveline parts allowed, except carbon fiber drive shaft for safety reasons. Max. 1 clutch disc, no smaller then 10.5 inch. No counter wts. allowed. Max. primary tube size on header 2". No more then 2 steps on header. Motor plates allowed. Cool can allowed. SpecC-12 VP fuel Cam lift .750 max at the valve. Stud mount rockers only, except Mopar. 14.32 max tire size. Wheelie wheels permitted. Max RPM chip allowed. No other chips allowed. Play back tach allowed. Maximum 5 forward gears. CLUTCH MUST BE USED IN ALL 5 GEARS IN THE TRUE CONVENTIONAL MANNER. Removable tunnel allowed. No more then 50\50 wt transfer. .4 pro tree only. Cam must be in stock location, remain stock diameter for engine used. Lifters must be stock diameter. Roller cams, and lifters allowed. Any radiator in stock location. Engine in stock location, plus, or minus 1" Distributor must remain in stock location. Crank trigger allowed. Any head under suspicion must be sent to Brodix, and $500 fee put up for the expense of protested. After market balancers required. Min, 8 pt cage. (up to NHRA) 1" site plug required in oil pan to inspect pump. .Autos remove 100 lbs. Must still maintain min wt.
__________________
don,t have one Last edited by randy wilson; 12-19-2013 at 12:16 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ga.
Posts: 521
Likes: 7
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Excellent. Question about cheaper short block might be Sight hole to observe Stock type crank and rods?(No aluminum rods,use nhra accepted rod for motor.)No Knife edge, no odd metal crank. Is this worth it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Dick, Joe, discuss. I'm open to anything. We had to start somewhere.Also, I see nothing wrong with that car. Allow 2 fours, and add wt.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 348
Liked 293 Times in 101 Posts
|
![]()
Dick,
I agree with you on keeping cranks from getting crazy,alum rod I don't see as issue,a good high quality steel rod cost more than alum rod does,so don't see it as money issue,personally if this class existed,and I was'nt allowed alum. rod I would probaly spend $300-500 more on steel rods I would trust @RPM I would be cranking. Randy, Stud mounted rockers vs.shaft are toss up, if starting with nothing cost is not much different,on these engines shafts would not be expensive,first off no offsets would be need so that cost less. Shafts are easier to get on engine like we are talking about if has long valves ,stud mounted have to buy $400.00 ish rocker that has clearance for anything over 1.500 spring or clearance some that cost 250 ish then add 75ish for best arp stud,150-250 for stud girdle,you are right at shaft price. One thing that could be possibly good ideal is limit lift @ valve to .630-.660 lift that eliminates reason for having valves over .100 longer,don't need all the extra installed height to get springs on heads that will work with bigger lifts,and that eliminates problems of getting rockers to work. If you ever have put .200-.300 longer valves in sbc w/stud rockers you know what I talking about,as rocker is higher up stud,pushrods get longer, rocker body gets closer to retainers,roller gets moved to outside tip of valve,this also happen on shafts,but all you do is get set of stands that moves rocker back toward intake,and has material added to bottom of stand so you don't need .150'' worth of shims. Also if shafts was allowed that would be level for all three brands on valvetrains. All rules look good to me,I would maybe add if not covered,material, bore spacing,deck height, maybe say deck has to be 9.00-9.500 that will cover sbc,mopar,and ford,or some how keep short deck exotic stuff out. I know this elimnates 8.200 (302) based windsor,but it's is probaly too short and could give advantage of lighter rotating assm to that combo over the others. Mike Taylor 3601 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Mike, I actually agree with all your points. I spent $2,600 on a set of steel rods, and I actually think aluminum rods are easier on parts. I love shaft rockers. I just didn't want people to think this is just about me. Blocks, a very good point made. Min. Deck, say 9". Cams, name your poison. I'm game for anything. Cranks, again, whatever works for me just so we make tear down easy.
__________________
don,t have one Last edited by randy wilson; 12-19-2013 at 05:39 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 651
Likes: 4
Liked 54 Times in 33 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Photographer
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 437
Likes: 35
Liked 3,170 Times in 292 Posts
|
![]()
Bruce Fulper : Please help me out. What does your post have to do with old modified Corvettes? Admittedly, I just take pictures. I am not a racer. I am not an engine builder. Seems that I am not understanding something.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 651
Likes: 4
Liked 54 Times in 33 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
THAT, my dear friend is what caused me to want to possibly jump in the fray too. :-) I'm fond of heads-up competition. These M/P ideas get me excited. Fun stuff. Happy New Year! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 228
Likes: 14
Liked 165 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
WHOA !!!! Bubski can see the reefer smoke from here as this post was being written !!! Even in todays make no sense world Bubski can't imagine how this relates to modified Vettes !! Bubski recomends taking your one hitter over to the lifter debacle thread !!! Cheers
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|