|
![]() |
#71 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
From hearing all of the arguments it sounds like the best fix is to get some formal training for the tech department of the NHRA. They need to take an approach like the NFL or NBA so that there is some consistency in how they go about enforcing rules in the handbook. Tech directors should conference call how they want to go about checking/enforcing rules and then put a written formal method of how to do that such that every division knows how things should be handled. From there training on this procedure needs to happen via online videos or classroom with some sort of test to verify the knowledge has been retained so all individuals doing tech inspections can be consistent division to division. The lack of consistency is what seems to be at fault and it seems as though there was no communication between divisions of problems as they come up. In situations were one division allowed something and another division did not, somebody needs to be contacted regarding that so that some consistency can be upheld. Also, racers surrounding that situation should be contacted to clarify whether there was a mistake on the ruling of not. I'm sure money is tight and none of the tech dept want anything of this magnitude but in the long run, it would help them.
I mean, if David was told one thing, Wendell was told another, and Charlie another, how could anyone expect that things would be consistent and there would be no repercussions by telling three people in the same class different things when all three have engine programs that are centered around innovation? Anybody familiar with ESPN's "COME ON MAN" segment, it would be appropriate for this situation in regards to the tech officials involved.. So two things: Get the ruling right in regards to the heads, Tech needs to work harder to be more consistent. PS: I want it to be know that all of I what I have suggested is waayyyy easier said than done.
__________________
Adriel Paradise, Paradise Racing Team Driver/Crew Chief(at least my dad claims me to be) B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of Arkansas Last edited by cutta; 02-28-2013 at 11:45 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Not a good idea to use major league sports as the template!
The NFL not so much, but it does remind one of the NBA where a personal foul by one player isn't a personal foul by another player or MLB where a strike is a strike for one pitcher or batter and isn't a strike for another pitcher or batter! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Clear Spring, MD
Posts: 193
Likes: 1,458
Liked 77 Times in 15 Posts
|
![]()
A request to the Stock and Super Stock Committee he been submitted for their consideration. The request proposes the creation of two classes in SS for running this combination, although not a specific solution on the classes or possible differences, which would need developed IF the proposal is seriously considered.
If, like me, you own a car and are interested in running a traditional combination following the SS rules and possibly returning to a real cross ram intake, while also allowing those with this combination free reign to turn the AH class into steel bodied pro stockers, my suggestion is to contact your SRAC representative or one of the S/SS Committee members found here: http://www.nhra.com/competition/committees.aspx and voice your opinion directly to them. The fast cars already spin the backhalf of the track in killer air on non-national event prepped tracks. Next is spoilers (safety), R&P steering (has been lobbied for in the past), and it has to be easier to machine an AL head then create what is now allowed to be done to a steel head (and for a few days the AL head was legal for AH this year until that issue was reversed/corrected in the guide). I'm all for letting the guys who want to run modified comp cars with this body style or steel bodied pro stocker versions of these cars. More power to them, and in their own class they can ask for all the changes they want or take the proven route of cheating/innovating/etc and then having the rule amended to allow what one group wants (intake before, heads now) but there should be an option for guys who don't want to cut their cars up, would like to retain the integrity and uniqueness of these cars under SS rules, and aren't ready to run Nostalgia races either. -Matt Welker |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 915
Likes: 1,134
Liked 682 Times in 203 Posts
|
![]()
I run in SS/AH with my 68 Barracuda. When I started building the car the index was 9.90. then it moved to 9.80, then to 9.30. I hoped the car could run 9.30's when I started the build, this was in 2005. I have Barton heads that I bought used, dated 5/00, and a nice short block with Diamond pistons, etc. I enjoy going to Indy to support the class, but never built it to run with the big dogs. I can run 50-60 runs with the same springs and have run a few 8.90's, but mostly 9 teens and twentys. As long as you have shoe polish on the windows I can race with anyone, except for a heads up run, which I have had only one in 4 years. The point is you can race and have fun and not worry about all the go real fast stuff and worry about who has the lastest trick of the week. I do have another engine going together that I would like to be faster, but I do not worry about being the fastest. Now, if someone has to much $$$ and would like a place to spend it, please let me know. See everyone this spring. Dyno "Gold Coast Hemi"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,633
Likes: 1,927
Liked 10,687 Times in 2,225 Posts
|
![]()
New prototype 2013 SS/AH cylinder head valve covers. Contact your local MoPar dealer for more info. Only offered in blue.
![]() Zoomed out ![]() Zoomed in |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 674
Likes: 15
Liked 584 Times in 94 Posts
|
![]()
OK Larry, That's it !!!!!!!!!!!! David won't do it, so I will, I contacted Levi . The Amish Mafia is on it! Someone, (or somebody's going down, probably Teuton.)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 765
Likes: 75
Liked 524 Times in 141 Posts
|
![]()
Or a Lewinski.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Stickville USA
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
__________________
Sean Fischer ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 846
Likes: 16
Liked 679 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Now on a serious note Two Scoop, you “kicked this skunk” starting this “holier than thou” thread calling people cheaters. I have never seen Charlie or his Dad changing hoods in a race. Their arbor was somewhat hidden. My chrome bolts were not as this was a car show and a drag race broke out. As for me, I have my cheater letter and ya’ll can call me “Screwhead Steve”. Welcome to the fraternity. PS: I do respect you going to work every day in the family business to provide for your beautiful young family. Just stay off the internet when you’re in a glass house. Stephen PS 2 Larry, that's my color... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 503
Likes: 130
Liked 451 Times in 77 Posts
|
![]()
Two scoop Lido! That's some funny stuff right there!!
BUT- this story only reinforces David's allegations! If he was in a glass house he would've finished the race with the tall scoop and the following week an addendum to the rules added allowing tall scoops, I'm all for tickling the rule right to the legal limit. But this 1/2 Hemi head stuff just doesn't do it for me ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|