|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: wv
Posts: 884
Likes: 42
Liked 56 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
the old cars stay home
can"t beat the new ones why waste money
__________________
Vic Guilmino 1129 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 114
Likes: 31
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
While I am a fan of the old iron also, the fact is its 2011 times change and that is whats happening like it or not. The cost of class racing is expensive old or new so either way you better have deep pockets to play the game.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 1,591
Liked 1,909 Times in 427 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Further, the availability of money is no excuse for what we're seeing. What it amounts to is two specific cars dominating qualifying and several classes in class eliminations, making every thing else obsolete. I know at least a couple of old school racers who could, if they wanted to, go buy several of the new cars, but they simply refuse to do so. Instead, they stay home, when they'd normally go to several races a year, especially Indy.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 114
Likes: 31
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
First of all not everyone does there own work. I have seen the bills on the head and intake work alone on some of these cars and it aint cheap. I guess I fail to see the difference in the first guys post about building a car for class racing. If I took an 60's model car and built a class car from the ground up, in the end I bet there would be very little price difference in getting a body in white and building a new car. By the time you disassembled the old car and acid dipped, replaced interior pieces, pulled out factory glass and bought aftermarket because it is lighter all the tricks you do to them to make the old car as nice as a lot of them that are out there it would cost a ton of money. Dont get me wrong I respect the old stuff, hell some of those cars are as nice as show cars, but if I was starting from scratch I know which way I would go. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The problem is the hp rating . if that was truly corrected there would not be 2008-2012 stockers at all unless the NHRA does what IHRA did and make their own class and let them have at it. At least this way the older cars would not think they have to stay home since they are bringing a knife to a gun fight...... I still like the new cars and are not knocking them , they just need their own classes...
![]()
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Livermore,Ca
Posts: 334
Likes: 15
Liked 145 Times in 32 Posts
|
![]()
Let me first say that the Horsepower factors are a joke..........
However it is not the fault of those that have them. They are i would assume having fun doing what they love to do. This has been going on for years. I can see Camaros and Firebird's that if i recall started as G and H cars now runnin C and D and still very competitive how many years later? There are a lot of posts on here about the olden days but there is a common theme to them if you look, the good and great ones either changed cars or combos regularly. Do you think that is because they got bored? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 1,591
Liked 1,909 Times in 427 Posts
|
![]()
I would reply to this again, but if you don't understand, it cannot be explained. It's one of those things where you either get it, or you don't get it.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 928
Likes: 1
Liked 120 Times in 42 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
David Huff got it right, there was an "old car" in the final.
In fact as best I can tell, only one Challenger won stock eliminator at a Divisional, (Dodge Challenger 5.7 at Noble OK last year) and now only one Challenger has won Stock Eliminator at a National (Dodge Challenger 360 in Indy )... So this year, except for Indy, all of the Divional winners, and all of the other Nationals winners were either Fords, or older cars. Challengers are NOT a huge problem, and most racers (defined as people who actually compete on the track and not just whine and moan on the keyboard when they actually have no skin in the game......) have really never actually been beaten by a Challenger Drag Pak. And apparently NOBODY has yet figured out that Supercharged cars have a dramatic advantage over naturally aspirated cars. And the Fords are the only one who run Supercharged cars. And has anyone noticed that Challengers now run only A/SA, AA/SA and a middle class like F/SA, but the Fords are all over the place, up and down the classes... Were the new cars factored correctly? No. But lots of cars in the past weren't either. So what really is the point? Time to give the Challengers a break, and start bashing on FORD for a change. David TheNew Hemi Guy Last edited by NewHemi; 09-06-2011 at 12:45 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 69
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|