HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2011, 03:02 AM   #1
greg fulk
VIP Member
 
greg fulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jackson
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Question 1964 Dart GT Conv.

A guy @ work just had one of these given to him with a 273 in it.....be a good "class" car or not?
__________________
Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN"
greg fulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 01:07 PM   #2
Harry 6674
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1964 Dart GT Conv.

Sure would be a cool car. IMO. Not sure how good it would be though.
Harry 6674 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 08:28 PM   #3
Jim Wahl
Veteran Member
 
Jim Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 665
Liked 683 Times in 129 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jim Wahl Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Wahl
Wink Re: 1964 Dart GT Conv.

'64 273 is only available with a very small 2bbl and rated 180/165. Not sure if anyone has had much success with this combo in a Dart. Wong maybe? They work ok in a wagon! Jim
__________________
Jim Wahl....NHRA #2239 S/SS - IHRA # 8 Stock, D2 Stock Champion (forever I guess)
2019 Baby Gators Stock Champion
2009 D2 National Open Stock Champion
1981 D2 West Palm Beach LDRS SS Runner Up
Past President, Southern Stock / Super Stock Association.

Last edited by Jim Wahl; 03-30-2011 at 09:56 PM.
Jim Wahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 09:26 PM   #4
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,789
Likes: 2,881
Liked 5,077 Times in 1,935 Posts
Default Re: 1964 Dart GT Conv.

Greg, He's going to need a roll bar, new harness every two years...Slow car, being chased all the time, all strapped in.... I vote NO


(4 speed makes T/Stock ..Check with Paul Wong if serious)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2011, 12:53 AM   #5
Tom Moock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: 1964 Dart GT Conv.

Mark, I was told at Houston points meet that you don`t have to replace seat belts every two years if you race N stock or below, even if you have a roll bar. Just put new belts in my O/SA wagon? Tom
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK
Tom Moock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2011, 01:04 AM   #6
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,789
Likes: 2,881
Liked 5,077 Times in 1,935 Posts
Default Re: 1964 Dart GT Conv.

Thanks,Tom
Interesting. Only sensible thing I've heard coming out of there in a long time.


BTW, NO ONE there has ever been able to explain why a 12.85 Stock Class car needs a roll bar, but an 11.50 bracket bomber doesn't.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2011, 02:18 AM   #7
greg fulk
VIP Member
 
greg fulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jackson
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Talking Re: 1964 Dart GT Conv.

Mark I told him about the roll bar.... I'm trying to get it from him just for the hell of it....I've never tried a Mopar & you know me I don't mind a "slow" class car!
__________________
Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN"
greg fulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.