|
![]() |
#81 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Is this your idea of having fun? The only way to cut costs is with strict rules enforcement. And we know that ain't going to happen.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS Last edited by art leong; 11-20-2010 at 11:31 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 238
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
Art your right. And Billy, Yes you can change class like Fletcher did and will have to do again very soon but how many people can drive like Dan ?
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Good points Stocker 2, But
You loose the Performance issue of Stock and SS. What does qualifying become? It becomes time trials where you learn what to dial first round and beyond. It leaves the race with only one incentive to go faster. Possible heads up runs. Oh, there is one other incentive, EGO..... The way the quota entry system works it kills the 128 car qualifying issues. If you have a race with a 70 quota you are in if you just attend. Indy and a few div 1 races will be the only places you are in a situation to go fast and make the 128 cutoff. So There goes that reason to be fast. How is this going to hurt the bread and butter business of Stock/SS engine and head suppliers? It looks like if a guy wants real performance he has to race in TD or TS where the qualified field still stands for performance.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 11-20-2010 at 11:46 AM. Reason: sp |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
"You lose the Performance issue of Stock and S/S." And your point is???? Look where the pursuit of performance has gotten us. It is on the verge of destroying Stock.
With an AHFS hit, it would take several times to keep a BB Chevy from running the index. Less than 10% of the cars cannot run at least .3 under. Besides it does not take $5000 heads on a Stocker to run below the index. One of the problems is $25K engines and $5K heads in Stock. That don't sound like bread and butter to 2/3 of the racers. Some of you guys have priced yourself into too high a level in the name of performance (and ego). You've been paying everyone else FOR horsepower in order to go fast, now its time to start paying WITH horsepower for going too fast. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,682 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Just like NHRA doesn't care enough to throw out the bogus parts, they certainly won't care about throwing out some bogus horsepower ratings.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
This becomes a safety issue also. How fast safely can you run a 9 inch tire car and at what weight? You guys with the AA-C cars and even slower know what I am talking about. More than once I have had both hands at 1000 ft and the pucker factor at about 10!
I don't think NHRA will make any changes for fear of loosing any deals they have with Ford and Mopar. It's a done deal. |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
I don't know where you got your numbers. You sure need to take a look at the latest Nitro Joe's stats. I don't think your numbers fit the stats.
Billy, in my case I have found it is also a new group of customers that are showing up with DP and Ford combos. I haven't had a "Real" stocker engine in the shop for several years. A few Crate motors then all of a sudden these DP's show up. Quote Stocker 2 "Just like NHRA doesn't care enough to throw out the bogus parts, they certainly won't care about throwing out some bogus horsepower ratings." I thought this is what the new and enhanced AHFS was going to do for everyone. Like Stocker 2 said.. I think You hit he nail on the head: Quote; You've been paying everyone else FOR horsepower in order to go fast, now its time to start paying WITH horsepower for going too fast. It looks like NHRA has found it easier, probably cheaper too, to work a few numbers and stats after a race than do tech and correctly factor combos. So we now have a system that punishes anyone wanting to go faster. Oh well, it is what it is.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 819
Likes: 131
Liked 478 Times in 80 Posts
|
![]()
Mike. If I'm reading this right, does this mean that if a Cavalier or Cobalt running a particular combination in SS/GT, that is also being run in a GT Camaro or Firebird, triggers and gets hp, that ONLY the Cavalier or Cobalt gets that hp, not the Camaro or Firebird???
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that is the way I read it! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 890
Likes: 679
Liked 1,019 Times in 367 Posts
|
![]()
Bryan, It's always said that. It just hasn't been enforced in GT. Maybe now it will be.
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|